About two indicators of the school digital renewal process
https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2023-38-5-5-15
Abstract
The indicators of the process of digital technologies introduction (school digital renewal indicators) widely used today successfully capture the innovative processes that occur at the initial stages (levels) of digital renewal. At the stages of mature informatization and digital transformation, the changes associated with the expansion of the traditional classroom system and the transition to personalized and competency-based learning organization come to the fore.
The authors propose two indicators that capture changes in the chronotope of study work and the teaching individualization level. The proposed indicators allow to reflect the dynamics of changes at the final stages of digital renewal. The use of school portals, which are being introduced at the final stages of digital renewal, provides conditions for assessing changes in the proposed indicators using digital traces, without contacting (surveys, questionnaires) the educational process participants.
The development of bases, methods, and tools for calculating the proposed indicators is of theoretical and practical interest for solving the problems of managing the digital renewal of education at the final stages of this process.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. Yu. UvarovRussian Federation
Alexander Yu. Uvarov, Doctor of Sciences (Education), Professor, Leading Researcher, Axel Berg Institute of Cybernetics and Educational Computing; Professor at the Department of Educational Programs, Institute of Education
Moscow
G. M. Vodopian
Russian Federation
Gregory M. Vodopian, Director; Vice Principal
Saint Petersburg
References
1. Uvarov A. Yu. The digital transformation and scenarios for the general education development. Moscow, HSE; 2020. 108 p. (In Russian.) Available at: https://ioe.hse.ru/pubs/share/direct/418229279.pdf
2. Uvarov A. Yu. Schools’ digital renewal: Steps to the “ideal school”. Informatics and Education. 2022;37(2):5–13. (In Russian.) EDN: PWDQJB. DOI: 10.32517/0234-0453-2022-37-2-5-13.
3. Dvoretskaya I. V. Process assessment of the level of ICT mastering in Russian schools. PhD in Education diss. Moscow; 2022. (In Russian.) Available at: https://www.hse.ru/data/xf/880/874/1109/fin_Дворецкая%20Диссертация_09.10.2022.pdf
4. Dvoretskaya I., Uvarov A., Kochak E. The smart education progress measurement: Can field experts’ opinions help? Resilience and Future of Smart Learning: Proc. 2022 Int. Conf. on Smart Learning Environments. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2022:226–232. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-5967-7_24.
5. Digital transformation: Expectations and reality. Reports to the XXIII Yasin (April) Int. Academic Conf. on Economic and Social Development. Moscow, ID HSE; 2022. 221 p. (In Russian.) Available at: https://issek.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/603838492.pdf
6. Semenov A. L. Productive education of extended personality in the transparent world on a digital platform. Herzen Readings: Psychological Research in Education. 2020;(3):590–596. (In Russian.) EDN: SHIVMX. DOI: 10.33910/herzenpsyconf-2020-3-27.
7. Vodopyan G. M., Uvarov A. Yu. From computer literacy and ICT implementation to transformation of school work. Informatics. 2016;(5):34–43. (In Russian.)
8. Buckley D. The personalisation by pieces framework: A framework for the incremental transformation of pedagogy towards greater learner empowerment in schools. CEA Publishing; 2006. 80 p.
9. Bloom B. S. Learning for mastery. Instruction and curriculum. Regional education laboratory for the Carolinas and Virginia, Topical Papers and Reprints, Number 1. Evaluation comment. 1968;1(2):1–11. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED053419.pdf
10. Bloom B. S. Human characteristics and school learning. New York, McGraw-Hill; 1976. 284 p.
11. Sturgis Ch., Casey K. Quality principles for competency-based education. Vienna, VA, iNACOL, 2018; 123 p. Available at: https://aurora-institute.org/wp-content/uploads/Quality-Principles-Book.pdf
12. Kulik C.-L. C., Kulik J. A., Bangert-Drowns R. L. Effectiveness of mastery learning programs: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research. 1990;60(2):265–299. DOI: 10.3102/00346543060002265.
13. Bergmann J. The mastery learning handbook: A competency-based approach to student achievement. Alexandria, VA, US, ASCD; 2022. 160 p.
14. Wiggins G., McTighe J. Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA, US, ASCD; 2005. 384p. DOI: 10.14483/calj.v19n1.11490.
15. Dvoretskaya I., Uvarov A., Vikhrev V. V. Models for updating general education in the developing digital environment: An annotated bibliography. Moscow, TORUS-Press; 2020. 122 p. (In Russian.) EDN: XJSTRV. DOI: 10.30826/94588-284-3.
16. Dvoretskaya I., Vodopian G. M., Uvarov A. Yu. Towards the construction of a multi-aspect model of the process of digital renewal of general education school. Moscow, Education and Informatics; 2023. (In Russian.) (In print.)
Review
For citations:
Uvarov A.Yu., Vodopian G.M. About two indicators of the school digital renewal process. Informatics and education. 2023;38(5):5-15. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2023-38-5-5-15