Preview

Informatics and education

Advanced search

About two indicators of the school digital renewal process

https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2023-38-5-5-15

Abstract

The indicators of the process of digital technologies introduction (school digital renewal indicators) widely used today successfully capture the innovative processes that occur at the initial stages (levels) of digital renewal. At the stages of mature informatization and digital transformation, the changes associated with the expansion of the traditional classroom system and the transition to personalized and competency-based learning organization come to the fore.

The authors propose two indicators that capture changes in the chronotope of study work and the teaching individualization level. The proposed indicators allow to reflect the dynamics of changes at the final stages of digital renewal. The use of school portals, which are being introduced at the final stages of digital renewal, provides conditions for assessing changes in the proposed indicators using digital traces, without contacting (surveys, questionnaires) the educational process participants.

The development of bases, methods, and tools for calculating the proposed indicators is of theoretical and practical interest for solving the problems of managing the digital renewal of education at the final stages of this process.

About the Authors

A. Yu. Uvarov
The Federal Research Center "Computer Science and Control" of the Russian Academy of Sciences; National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation

Alexander Yu. Uvarov, Doctor of Sciences (Education), Professor, Leading Researcher, Axel Berg Institute of Cybernetics and Educational Computing; Professor at the Department of Educational Programs, Institute of Education

Moscow



G. M. Vodopian
Resource Training Center of Higher Technologies "ORT-St.Petersburg"; School 550
Russian Federation

Gregory M. Vodopian, Director; Vice Principal

Saint Petersburg



References

1. Uvarov A. Yu. The digital transformation and scenarios for the general education development. Moscow, HSE; 2020. 108 p. (In Russian.) Available at: https://ioe.hse.ru/pubs/share/direct/418229279.pdf

2. Uvarov A. Yu. Schools’ digital renewal: Steps to the “ideal school”. Informatics and Education. 2022;37(2):5–13. (In Russian.) EDN: PWDQJB. DOI: 10.32517/0234-0453-2022-37-2-5-13.

3. Dvoretskaya I. V. Process assessment of the level of ICT mastering in Russian schools. PhD in Education diss. Moscow; 2022. (In Russian.) Available at: https://www.hse.ru/data/xf/880/874/1109/fin_Дворецкая%20Диссертация_09.10.2022.pdf

4. Dvoretskaya I., Uvarov A., Kochak E. The smart education progress measurement: Can field experts’ opinions help? Resilience and Future of Smart Learning: Proc. 2022 Int. Conf. on Smart Learning Environments. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2022:226–232. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-5967-7_24.

5. Digital transformation: Expectations and reality. Reports to the XXIII Yasin (April) Int. Academic Conf. on Economic and Social Development. Moscow, ID HSE; 2022. 221 p. (In Russian.) Available at: https://issek.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/603838492.pdf

6. Semenov A. L. Productive education of extended personality in the transparent world on a digital platform. Herzen Readings: Psychological Research in Education. 2020;(3):590–596. (In Russian.) EDN: SHIVMX. DOI: 10.33910/herzenpsyconf-2020-3-27.

7. Vodopyan G. M., Uvarov A. Yu. From computer literacy and ICT implementation to transformation of school work. Informatics. 2016;(5):34–43. (In Russian.)

8. Buckley D. The personalisation by pieces framework: A framework for the incremental transformation of pedagogy towards greater learner empowerment in schools. CEA Publishing; 2006. 80 p.

9. Bloom B. S. Learning for mastery. Instruction and curriculum. Regional education laboratory for the Carolinas and Virginia, Topical Papers and Reprints, Number 1. Evaluation comment. 1968;1(2):1–11. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED053419.pdf

10. Bloom B. S. Human characteristics and school learning. New York, McGraw-Hill; 1976. 284 p.

11. Sturgis Ch., Casey K. Quality principles for competency-based education. Vienna, VA, iNACOL, 2018; 123 p. Available at: https://aurora-institute.org/wp-content/uploads/Quality-Principles-Book.pdf

12. Kulik C.-L. C., Kulik J. A., Bangert-Drowns R. L. Effectiveness of mastery learning programs: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research. 1990;60(2):265–299. DOI: 10.3102/00346543060002265.

13. Bergmann J. The mastery learning handbook: A competency-based approach to student achievement. Alexandria, VA, US, ASCD; 2022. 160 p.

14. Wiggins G., McTighe J. Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA, US, ASCD; 2005. 384p. DOI: 10.14483/calj.v19n1.11490.

15. Dvoretskaya I., Uvarov A., Vikhrev V. V. Models for updating general education in the developing digital environment: An annotated bibliography. Moscow, TORUS-Press; 2020. 122 p. (In Russian.) EDN: XJSTRV. DOI: 10.30826/94588-284-3.

16. Dvoretskaya I., Vodopian G. M., Uvarov A. Yu. Towards the construction of a multi-aspect model of the process of digital renewal of general education school. Moscow, Education and Informatics; 2023. (In Russian.) (In print.)


Review

For citations:


Uvarov A.Yu., Vodopian G.M. About two indicators of the school digital renewal process. Informatics and education. 2023;38(5):5-15. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2023-38-5-5-15

Views: 258


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0234-0453 (Print)
ISSN 2658-7769 (Online)