Preview

Информатика и образование

Расширенный поиск
Доступ открыт Открытый доступ  Доступ закрыт Только для подписчиков

ДИДАКТИКА ЦИФРОВОЙ ЭПОХИ: ОТ ПРЕПОДАВАНИЯ К ИНЖЕНЕРИИ УЧЕНИЯ (Часть 1)

https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2018-33-9-53-62

Полный текст:

Аннотация

Цифровая эпоха требует пересмотра традиционного преподавания и учения. Быстро растущие технологические инновации в образовании обусловливают смену парадигмы от традиционного преподавания к инженерии учения. Таким образом, основное внимание в статье уделено разработке и внедрению эффективных учебных сред на основе использования информационных и коммуникационных технологий в различных форматах: очное обучение, смешанное и дистанционное. Инженерия учения требует нового понимания и переосмысления традиционной дидактики в направлении е-дидактики (электронной дидактики), чтобы эффективно проектировать и умело согласовывать цели учения, его содержание и систему оценивания в цифровую эпоху.

Об авторе

М. А. Чошанов
Техасский университет в Эль-Пасо, Техас
Соединённые Штаты Америки

доктор пед. наук, профессор, профессор кафедры математических наук и подготовки учителей

EDU612, 500 W. University Avenue, El Paso, TX 79968, United States



Список литературы

1. Hamilton D. The pedagogic paradox (or Why no didactics in England?). Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 1999, vol. 7 (1), p. 135–152.

2. Nordkvelle Y. T. Didactics: From classical rhetoric to kitchen-Latin. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 2003, vol. 11 (3), p. 315–330.

3. Illich I. In the graveyard of the text: A commentary to Hugh’s Didascalicon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.

4. Myhre R. Pedagogisk idehistorie fra oldtiden til 1860. Oslo: Fabritius, 1976.

5. Hugh St Victor. The Didascalicon. Trans. by J. Taylor. NY: Columbia University Press, 1961.

6. Grabmann M. Hugh St Victor’s Didascalicon: En hoyskolepedagogikk’for det 12 arhundre. Agora, 1998, no. 1, p. 39–46.

7. Fefner J. Tanke og Tale: Den Retoriske Tradisjon i Vesteuropa. Kobenhavn: C. A. Reitzels Forlag, 1982.

8. Ong W. Ramus: Method and the decay of dialogue. 2nd ed. New York: Octagon Books, 1974.

9. Hotson H. Philosophical pedagogy in reformed central Europe between Ramus and Comenius. Samuel Hartlieb and universal reformation: Studies in intellectual communication (M. Greengrass, M. Leslie, T. Raylor, eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, p. 29–50.

10. Chevallard Y. Sur l’ingйnierie didactique, 1982. Preprint. Marseille: IREM d’Aix Marseille. Available at: http://yves.chevallard.free.fr/spip/spip/article.php3?id_article=195

11. Brousseau G. Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, 1997.

12. Goodchild S., Sriraman B. Revisiting the didactic triangle: From the particular to the general. ZDM — The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 2012, vol. 44 (5), p. 581–585.

13. Schoenfeld A. Problematizing the didactical triangle. ZDM — The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 2012, vol. 44 (5), p. 587–599.

14. Tall D., Vinner S. Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 1981, vol. 12 (20), p. 151–169.

15. Ruthven K. The didactical tetrahedron as a heuristic for analysing the incorporation of digital technologies into classroom practice in support of investigative approaches to teaching mathematics. ZDM — The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 2012, vol. 44 (5), p. 627–640.

16. Bergmann J., Sams A. Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Alexandria: VA: ASCD, 2012.

17. Mitra S. Self-organising systems for mass computer literacy: Findings from the ‘hole in the wall’ experiments. International Journal for Development Issues, 2005, vol. 4 (1), p. 71–81.

18. Koehler M., Mishra P. What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 2009, vol. 29 (4), p. 60–70.

19. D’Angelo G. From didactics to e-didactics: e-Learning paradigms, models and techniques. Napoli: Liguori, 2007.

20. Bransford J., Brown A., Cocking R., eds. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000.

21. Bybee R., Taylor J. A., Gardner A., Van Scotter P., Carlson J., Westbrook A., Landes N. The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS, 2006.

22. Artigue M., Perrin-Glorian M. Didactic engineering, research and development tool: Some theoretical problems linked to this duality. For the Learning of Mathematics, 1991, vol. 11, p. 13–17.

23. Artigue M. Didactic engineering. Recherches en Didactique des Mathematiques, Special book ICME VII, 1992.

24. Douady R. Didactic engineering. Learning and teaching mathematics: An international perspective (T. Nunes, P. Bryant, eds.). East Sussex: Psychology Press, 1997, p. 373–401.

25. Ruthven K. Linking researching with teaching: Towards synergy of scholarly and craft knowledge. Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education (Lyn D. English, ed.). London: LEA, 2002, p. 581–598.

26. Greigner B. Introduction to MOOCs: Avalanche, illusion or augmentation? Policy Brief, July 2013. UNESCO IITE.

27. Yuan L., Powell S. MOOCs and Open Education: Implications for Higher Education. Available at: http://publications.cetis.ac.uk/2013/667

28. Jaschik S.MOOC skeptics at the top. Inside Higher Ed. May 02, 2013. Available at: http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/05/02/survey-finds-presidents-are-skeptical-moocs

29. Kolowich S. Duke U.’s undergraduate faculty derails plan for online courses for credit. The Chronicle of Higher Education. April 30, 2013. Available at: http://chronicle.com/article/Duke-Us-Undergraduate/138895/?cid=at&utm_source=at&utm_medium=en

30. Information society for technology in education. The National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers. ISTE, 2008. Available at: http://www.iste.org/standards/nets-for-teachers.

31. UNESCO ICT Competency Framework for Teachers. UNESCO, 2011. Available at: http://www.unesco.org/new/en/unesco/themes/icts/teacher-education/unesco-ictcompetency-framework-for-teachers/

32. Jaworsky B. Mathematics teaching development as a human practice: Identifying and drawing the threads. ZDM — The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 2012, vol. 44 (5). DOI: 10.1007/s11858-012-0437-7

33. Sawyer K., ed. The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

34. Dym C., Agogino A., Eris O., Frey D., Leifer L. Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 2005, vol. 94 (1), p. 103–120.


Для цитирования:


Чошанов М.А. ДИДАКТИКА ЦИФРОВОЙ ЭПОХИ: ОТ ПРЕПОДАВАНИЯ К ИНЖЕНЕРИИ УЧЕНИЯ (Часть 1). Информатика и образование. 2018;(9):53-62. https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2018-33-9-53-62

For citation:


Tchoshanov M.A. DIGITAL AGE DIDACTICS: FROM TEACHING TO ENGINEERING OF LEARNING (Part 1). Informatics and education. 2018;(9):53-62. https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2018-33-9-53-62

Просмотров: 224


ISSN 0234-0453 (Print)
ISSN 2658-7769 (Online)