Preview

Informatics and education

Advanced search

Technology of differentiated training bases of algorithmization and programming on the first course of the university on the basis of the DL.GSU.BY system of distance learning

https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2021-36-6-60-66

Abstract

The article describes the technology of teaching text-based programming on the basis of the DL.GSU.BY website. The main advantages of the technology include: “zero entry threshold”, training adapted to the student, many years of practical experience, efficiency, scalability. The following issues are consistently considered in the article: idealized goal setting; the use by students of a programming language of their choice from a variety of modern programming languages when performing practical tasks in the discipline; a clear verification of goal achievement; blended learning; effective personalization of the educational process; non-standard organizational and technical decisions; effectiveness of training. The idealized goal setting includes the need to teach students the following: algorithmic reformulation of the problem statement; knowledge of a set of basic language constructs, as well as basic builtin procedures and functions; the ability to use basic algorithms on one-dimensional and two-dimensional arrays, sets of plane points, lines, queues; the ability to develop and debug new algorithms. Effective personalization of the educational process is provided with the help of such techniques: at each lesson, the student is offered a choice of activities that correspond to current level of his training; automatic verification of solutions is provided with the test assignment service; the system of automatic differentiated learning is used.

About the Authors

M. S. Dolinsky
Francisk Skorina Gomel State University
Belarus

Mikhail S. Dolinsky, Candidate of Sciences (Engineering), Docent, Associate Professor at the Department of Mathematical Problems of Management and Informatics, Faculty of Mathematics and Technologies of Programming, Gomel



M. A. Dolinskaya
Francisk Skorina Gomel State University
Belarus

Maria A. Dolinskaya, Assistant Professor at the Department of Mathematical Problems of Management and Informatics, Faculty of Mathematics and Technologies of Programming, Gomel



References

1. Aznam N., Perdana R., Jumadi J., Nurcahyo H., Wiyatmo Y. The implementation of Blended Learning and Peer Tutor Strategies in Pandemic Era: A systematic review. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. 2021;(541):906–914. DOI: 10.2991/assehr.k.210326.130

2. Kakeshita T., Ohtsuki M. Survey and analysis of computing education at Japanese universities: Non-IT departments and courses. Olympiads in Informatics. 2019;(13):57–79. Available at: https://ioinformatics.org/journal/v13_2019_57_80.pdf

3. Jones K. A., Sharma R. S. Higher education 4.0. The digital transformation of classroom lectures to Blended Learning. Singapore: Springer; 2021. 279 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-33-6683-1

4. Zaugg H., Graham C. R., Lim C. P., Wang T. Current and future directions of Blended Learning and teaching in Asia. Blended Learning for Inclusive and Quality Higher Education in Asia. Singapore: Springer; 2021. P. 301–327. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-33-4106-7

5. Stahl G. Redesigning mathematical curriculum for Blended Learning. Education Sciences. 2021;11(4):165–177. DOI: 10.3390/educsci11040165

6. Astarilla L., Warman D. The effect of Google classroom in Blended Learning on university students’ English ability. J-SHMIC: Journal of English for Academic. 2021;8(1):12–23. DOI: 10.25299/jshmic.2021.vol8(1).6216

7. Antwi-Boampong A. Blended Learning adoption in higher education: Presenting the lived experiences of students in a public university from a developing country. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. 2021;20(2):14–22. Available at: http://www.tojet.net/articles/v20i2/2022.pdf

8. Oktaria S. D., Sasongko R. N., Kristiawan M. Development of Blended Learning designs using Moodle to support academics of the curriculum in university of Bengkulu. Jurnal Studi Guru dan Pembelajaran. 2021;4(1):118–126.

9. Lodi M., Malchiodi D., Monga M., Morpurgo A., Spieler B. Constructionist attempts at supporting the learning of computer programming: A survey. Olympiads in Informatics. 2019;(13):99–121. Available at: https://ioinformatics.org/journal/v13_2019_99_122.pdf

10. Weigend M., Vaníček J., Pluhár Z., Pesek I. Computational thinking education through creative unplugged activities. Olympiads in Informatics. 2019;(13):171–192. Available at: https://ioinformatics.org/journal/v13_2019_171_192.pdf

11. Chamberlain S., Elford D., Lancaster S. J., Silve F. Tailored Blended Learning for foundation year chemistry students. 2021;75(1-2):18–26. DOI: 10.2533/chimia.2021.18

12. Lovey T., O’Keeffe P., Petignat I. Basic medical training for refugees via collaborative Blended Learning: Quasiexperimental design. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2021;23(3). DOI: 10.2196/22345

13. Bond С. E., Cawood A. J. A role for virtual outcrop models in Blended Learning — improved 3D thinking and positive perceptions of learning. Geoscience Communication. 2021;4(2):233–244. DOI: 10.5194/gc-4-233-2021

14. Sarkar S., Sharma S., Raheja S. Implementation of Blended Learning approach for improving anatomy lectures of Phase I MBBS students — learner satisfaction survey. Advances in Medical Education and Practice. 2021;(12):413–420. DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S301634

15. Sulistiyarini D., Sabirin F., Ramadhani D. Effect of project-based learning through Blended Learning on website design skills. Journal of Educational Science and Technology. 2021;7(1):58–66. Available at: http://103.76.50.195/JEST/article/view/17789

16. Border S., Woodward C., Kurn O., Birchall C., Laurayne H., Anbu D., Taylor C., Hall S. Working in creative partnership with students to co-produce neuroanatomy e-Learning resources in a new era of Blended Learning. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2021;14(4):417–425. DOI: 10.1002/ase.2090

17. Jerry M., Yunu M. Blended Learning in rural primary ESL classroom: Do or Don’t. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. 2021;20(2):152–173. DOI: 10.26803/ijlter.20.2.9

18. Al Musawi A. S., Ammar M. E. The effect of different blending levels of traditional and e-Learning delivery on academic achievement and students’ attitudes towards Blended Learning at Sultan Qaboos University. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. 2021;20(2):127–139. Available at: http://www.tojet.net/articles/v20i2/20213.pdf

19. Dolinsky M. Gomel training school for olympiads in informatics. Olympiads in Informatics. 2016;(10):237–247.

20. Dolinsky M. An approach to teach introductorylevel computer programming. Olympiads in Informatics. 2013;(7):14–22.


Review

For citations:


Dolinsky M.S., Dolinskaya M.A. Technology of differentiated training bases of algorithmization and programming on the first course of the university on the basis of the DL.GSU.BY system of distance learning. Informatics and education. 2021;(6):60-66. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2021-36-6-60-66

Views: 438


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0234-0453 (Print)
ISSN 2658-7769 (Online)