Instructional design: How to design the expected learning outcomes of students?
https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2021-36-6-4-10
Abstract
The article is devoted to current issues of lesson design based on student expected learning outcomes. One of the distinctive features of recently approved new Federal State Educational Standards for primary and basic general education is refined and detailed requirements for the expected educational outcomes. In this regard, tools for the teacher to develop those outcomes in order to plan a lesson or a study course in a logical way taking into account the educational interests of students are in dire need. The authors of the article consider the Understanding by Design model as such a tool, since this framework makes it possible to design learning outcomes (distinguishing between understanding, acquisition and transfer goals) and direct the learning process towards desired results. The article provides theoretical foundations for the development of an instructional design model, examines the stages of the design of learning outcomes, the selection of study activities and the identification of teaching strategies. A description of the first stage of design — the design of the expected learning outcomes according to different facets of understanding and of the acquisition and transfer goals — is given in detail.
About the Authors
A. A. KuznetsovRussian Federation
Alexander A. Kuznetsov, Doctor of Sciences (Education), Professor, Academician, Moscow
E. V. Chernobay
Russian Federation
Elena V. Chernobay, Doctor of Sciences (Education), Professor, Professor at the Department of Educational Programs, Institute of Education, Moscow
References
1. Киселев А. Ф., Кузнецов А. А. Проблема внедрения новых стандартов в практику школьного образования. Педагогика. 2013;(6):55–72.
2. Кузнецов А. А. Разработка Федеральных государственных стандартов общего образования. Педагогика. 2009;(4):3–10.
3. Приказ Министерства просвещения Российской Федерации от 31 мая 2021 № 287 «Об утверждении федерального государственного образовательного стандарта основного общего образования». Режим доступа: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_389560/
4. Tyler R. W. Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1949. 134 р.
5. Stenhouse L. An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heineman; 1975. 248 р.
6. McTighe J., Wiggins G. Understanding by design. ASCD; 2005. 370 p. Available at: https://www.ascd.org/books/understanding-by-design-expanded-2nd-edition
7. McTighe J., Wiggins G. The understanding by design professional development workbook. ASCD; 2004. 95 p. Available at: https://www.ascd.org/books/the-understanding-bydesign-professional-development-workbook
8. Wiggins G. What is UbD? Grant Wiggins answers, with video cases. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WsDgfC3SjhM
9. Mitchell I., Keast S., Panizzon D., Mitchell J. Using ‘big ideas’ to enhance teaching and student learning. Teachers and Teaching. 2017;23(5):596–610. DOI: 10.1080/13540602.2016.1218328
10. Wynn C. M., Wiggins A. W. The five biggest ideas in science. NYC: Wiley; 1996. 210 p.
11. McTighe J., Wiggins G. Essential questions: Opening doors to student understanding. ASCD; 2013. 120 p. Available at: https://www.ascd.org/books/essential-questions
12. Фейгенберг И. М. Учимся всю жизнь. М.: Смысл; 2014. 223 с.
13. Wiggins G., McTighe J. The understanding by design guide to creating high-quality units. ASCD; 2011. 118 p. Available at: https://www.ascd.org/books/the-understanding-by-design-guide-to-creating-high-quality-units
Review
For citations:
Kuznetsov A.A., Chernobay E.V. Instructional design: How to design the expected learning outcomes of students? Informatics and education. 2021;(6):4-10. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2021-36-6-4-10