SMART lecture as modular visualization of mathematical information in higher education
https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2020-35-6-27-35
Abstract
The article reveals the problem of teaching higher mathematics to students studying in non-mathematical areas of training, based on the process of modular visualization of mathematical information. The relevance of the study is confirmed by foreign and domestic psychological and pedagogical studies on the development of visual thinking, the foundation of which is the discovery of the functional asymmetry of the cerebral hemispheres. The purpose of the article is to identify the effectiveness of using SMART-lectures in teaching higher mathematics for the process of developing visual thinking, which helps to increase the effectiveness of teaching. The study is carried out by integrating interactive computer technology and visual education in higher mathematics. Solving research problems is aimed at using interactive computer technologies, in particular, at using interactive whiteboards in teaching higher mathematics. The concepts of modular visualization, visual training are revealed, the main means of visual training, interactive computer technologies are given and explained, referring to the analysis of various approaches to their interpretations. For the first time, a SMART lecture is described and justified as one of the interactive forms of organizing visual education in higher mathematics, which contains all the components of visual education identified by the author. The effectiveness of SMART lectures for the process of developing visual thinking in teaching higher mathematics, which contributes to the effectiveness of learning, has been experimentally substantiated. The necessity of visual means of interactive computer technology as an integral part of modern education is emphasized. It is concluded that the implementation of such interactive forms of organizing visual education in higher mathematics as a SMART lecture promotes the development of visual education in teaching higher mathematics, activates students in the educational process, thereby increasing the effectiveness of training.
About the Author
O. V. IvanovaRussian Federation
Olga V. Ivanova, Candidate of Sciences (Education), Docent, Associate Professor at the Department of Higher Mathematics, 125047, Russia, Moscow, Miusskaya ploshchad', 9
References
1. Sperry R. W. Some effects of disconnecting the cerebral hemispheres. 1981. Available at: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/1981/sperry/25059-roger-w-sperrynobel-lecture-1981
2. Dalinger V. A. Naglyadnye obrazy matematicheskikh ob”ektov kak predmet i sredstvo dlya izucheniya [Visual images of mathematical objects as a subject and a means for studying]. Omsk, OSPU, 2013. 74 p. (In Russian.)
3. Reznik N. A. Metodicheskie osnovy obucheniya matematike v srednej shkole s ispol’zovaniem sredstv razvitiya vizual’nogo myshleniya: dis. … d-ra ped. nauk [Methodological foundations of teaching mathematics in secondary school using the means of developing visual thinking. Dr. ped. sci. diss.]. Murmansk, 1997. 500 p. (In Russian.)
4. Tsukar A. Ya. Metodicheskie osnovy obucheniya matematike v srednej shkole s ispol’zovaniem obraznogo myshleniya: dis. … d-ra ped. nauk [Methodological foundations of teaching mathematics in secondary school using figurative thinking. Dr. ped. sci. diss.]. Novosibirsk, 1999. 430 p. (In Russian.)
5. Jonsson B., Norqvist M., Liljekvist Y., Lithner J. Learning mathematics through algorithmic and creative reasoning. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 2014, vol. 36, p. 20–32. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2014.08.003
6. Vieira C., Parsons P., Byrd V. Visual learning analytics of educational data: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Computers & Education, 2018, vol. 122, p. 119–135. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.018
7. Firer A. V. Razvitie poznavatel’nykh universal’nykh uchebnykh dejstvij uchashhikhsya osnovnoj shkoly pri obuchenii ponyatiyam funktsional’noj linii algebry sredstvami vizualizatsii: dis. ... kand. ped. nauk [Development of cognitive universal educational actions of primary school students in teaching the concepts of the functional line of algebra with visualization tools. Cand. ped. sci. diss.]. Krasnoyarsk, 2018. 225 p. (In Russian.)
8. Shatalov V. F. Tochka opory [Fulcrum]. Moscow, Pedagogika, 1987. 159 p. (In Russian.)
9. Trukhan I. A., Trukhan D. A. Vizualizatsiya uchebnoj informatsii v obuchenii matematike, ee znachenie i rol’ [Visualization of training information in the learning of mathematics, its importance and the role]. Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya — Advances in Current Natural Sciences, 2013, no. 10, p. 113–115. (In Russian.)
10. Choshanov M. A. Gibkaya tekhnologiya problemno-modul’nogo obucheniya [Flexible technology of problemmodular learning]. Moscow, Narodnoe obrazovanie, 1996. 160 p. (In Russian.) Available at: http://pedlib.ru/Books/2/0157/2-0157-1.shtml
11. Plaksina I. V. Interaktivnye tekhnologii v obuchenii i vospitanii [Interactive technologies in teaching and education]. Vladimir, VlSU, 2014. 162 p. (In Russian.)
12. Krasilnikova V. A. Teoriya i tekhnologii komp’yuternogo obucheniya i testirovaniya [Theory and technology of computer learning and testing]. Moscow, Dom pedagogiki, 2009. 335 p. (In Russian.)
13. Pardała A. Informatizatsiya matematicheskogo obrazovaniya: didakticheskie vozmozhnosti, opyt i zarubezhnye tendentsii [Informatization of mathematics education: Didactic opportunities, experience and foreign trends]. Informatika i obrazovanie — Informatics and Education, 2019, no. 6, p. 49–55. (In Russian.)
14. Ivanova O. V. Konstruirovanie kompleksa internet tekhnologij innovatsionnoj komp’yuternoj didaktiki po matematike (tema “Аlgebraicheskaya sistema mnozhestv”) [Construction of a complex of Internet technologies for innovative computer didactics in mathematics (topic “Algebraic set system”)]. Shkol’nye gody — School Years, 2015, no. 60, p. 45–60. (In Russian.)
15. Ivanova O. V., Deeva S. A., Skarbich S. N. Interaktivnye komp’yuternye tekhnologii SMART v formirovanii ehlementov stokhasticheskoj kul’tury shkol’nikov [SMART interactive computer technologies in the formation of elements of stochastic culture of schoolchildren]. Informatika i obrazovanie — Informatics and Education, 2015, no. 4, p. 22–26. (In Russian.)
16. Ganashok A. V. Interaktivnaya doska kak sredstvo povysheniya poznavatel’noj aktivnosti i ehffektivnosti obucheniya na urokakh informatiki [Interactive whiteboard as a means of increasing the cognitive activity and efficiency of learning in the classroom of informatics]. Informatsionnye tekhnologii i sredstva obucheniya — Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 2016, vol. 51, no. 1, p. 21–35. (In Ukrainian.) DOI: 10.33407/itlt.v51i1.1331
17. Romanova G. V. Razvitie inoyazychnoj grammaticheskoj kompetentsii obuchayushhikhsya 9 klassov na osnove primeneniya interaktivnoj doski: dis. ... kand. ped. nauk [Development of foreign language grammatical competence of 9th grade students based on the use of an interactive whiteboard. Cand. ped. sci. diss.]. Ekaterinburg, 2016. 253 p. (In Russian.)
18. Volodarskaya O. V. Obuchenie uchashhikhsya 7–8-kh klassov osnovnoj shkoly ustnoj inoyazychnoj rechi s ispol’zovaniem kollektivno-gruppovogo vzaimodejstviya i ehlektronnoj interaktivnoj doski: na materiale nemetskogo yazyka kak vtorogo inostrannogo: dis. … kand. ped. nauk [Teaching students of 7–8th grades of basic school of oral foreign language using collective-group interaction and an electronic interactive board: on the material of German as a second foreign language. Cand. ped. sci. diss.]. Saint Petersburg, 2015. 287 p. (In Russian.)
19. Smith H. J., Higgins S., Wall K., Miller J. Interactive whiteboards: boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2005, vol. 21, is. 2, p. 91–101. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00117.x
20. Dostal J. Reflections on the use of interactive whiteboards in instruction in international context. The New Educational Review, 2011, vol. 25, no. 3, p. 205–220. Available at: http://karsenti.scedu.umontreal.ca/archives/tbi-recherches/NewEducationalReview.pdf
21. Dalinger V. A. Teoreticheskie osnovy kognitivnovizual’nogo podkhoda k obucheniyu matematike [Theoretical foundations of the cognitive-visual approach to teaching mathematics]. Omsk, OSPU, 2006. 143 p. (In Russian.)
22. Lebedev V. V. Ehffektivnoe obuchenie kombinatorike i teorii veroyatnostej [Effective training of combinatorics and probability theory]. Shkol’nye tekhnologii — School Technologies, 2012, no. 2, p. 126–134. (In Russian.)
23. Ponyatie SMART [SMART criteria]. (In Russian.) Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMART_criteria
Review
For citations:
Ivanova O.V. SMART lecture as modular visualization of mathematical information in higher education. Informatics and education. 2020;(6):27-35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2020-35-6-27-35