Preview

Informatics and education

Advanced search

Measuring the achievements of student for creating the individual training schedule in the electronic environment

https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2020-35-4-46-52

Abstract

The article is devoted to the automation of the educational process in terms of measuring the achievements of student in electronic training systems (EOS) to solve the problems of creating an individual training schedule. Psychological and pedagogical concepts used for evaluation of learning material acquisition are considered. It has been found that the approaches used to measure the achievements of students are not suitable for the electronic environment. In order to build an individual schedule for studying materials in the educational discipline in the EOS, it is proposed to measure the amount of work done by the student. To achieve this goal, a scale developed on the basis of the structure of its activity of the trainee in the process of achieving the objectives of the training is proposed. Five steps are highlighted in the achievement of the learning goal: 1) mastering the conceptual framework, 2) assimilation of knowledge of a way of actions, 3) formation of ability, 4) formation of skill, 5) formation of ability to solve non-standard problems. Considering the obtained stages of formation of ability to carry out studied activities as levels of mastery of educational material, a scale of levels of mastery is obtained. The types of tasks in LMS Moodle are given, which can be used to monitor the achievement of the selected levels of learning material. This scale can be used to calculate the labour intensity of the student’s work during the mastering of educational material, to plan the curriculum, to form an individual training schedule.

About the Author

M. A. Anikieva
Siberian Federal University
Russian Federation

Marina A. Anikieva, Senior Lecturer at the Department of Artificial Intelligence Systems, Institute of Space and Information Technologies

660041, Krasnoyarsk, Svobodny prospect, 79



References

1. Grigoriev S. G., Mishota I. Yu. Digital University: An actual paradigm of the education informatization. Modern management trends and the digital economy: From regional development to global economic growth. Proc. 1st Int. Scientific Conf. Ekaterinburg, Atlantis Press, 2019. DOI: 10.2991/mtde-19.2019.128

2. Klašnja-Milićević A., Ivanović M., Nanopoulos A. Recommender systems in e-learning environments: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2015, vol. 44, is. 4, p. 571–604. DOI: 10.1007/s10462-015-9440-z

3. Heywood J. The assessment of learning in engineering education: Practice and policy. New Jersey, Wiley-IEEE Press, 2016. 366 p. Available at: https://www.wiley.com/en-us/The+Assessment+of+Learning+in+Engineering+Education%3A+Practice+and+Policy-p-9781119175513

4. Kaldybaev S. K. Pedagogicheskie izmereniya: stanovlenie i razvitie [Pedagogical measurements: Formation and development]. Bishkek, Аjat, 2008. 208 p. (In Russian.)

5. Day I. N. Z., van Blankenstein F. M., Westenberg M., Admiraal W. A review of the characteristics of intermediate assessment and their relationship with student grades. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2017, vol. 43, is. 6, p. 908–929. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2017.1417974

6. Shuell T. J. Cognitive conceptions of learning. Review of Educational Research, 1986, vol. 56, is. 4, p. 411–436. DOI: 10.2307/1170340

7. Kahiigi E. K., Ekenberg L., Hansson H., Tusubira F. F., Danielson M. Exploring the e-Learning state of art. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 2008, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 77–88. Available at: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A185115&dswid=3828

8. Galeev I. Kh. Intellektual’nye obuchayushhie sistemy: teoreticheskie osnovy [Intelligent learning systems: Theoretical foundations]. Kazan, KNRTU-KAI, 2018. 76 p. (In Russian.)

9. Guerrero-Roldán A. E., Noguera I. A model for aligning assessment with competences and learning activities in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 2018, vol. 38, p. 36–46. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.04.005

10. Stödberg U. A research review of e-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2012, vol. 37, is. 5, p. 591–604. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2011.557496

11. Prokhorov A. M. Sovetskij ehntsiklopedicheskij slovar’ [Soviet encyclopedic dictionary]. Moscow, Sovetskaya Ehntsiklopediya, 1986. 1600 p. (In Russian.)

12. Tyler R. W. Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1949. 144 p. Available at: https://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/B/bo17239506.html

13. Bloom B. S. The relationship between educational objectives and examinations designed to measure achievement in general education courses at the college level. Doctoral diss. Chicago, 1946. 124 p.

14. Bespalko V. P. Slagaemye pedagogicheskoj tekhnologii [Components of pedagogical technology]. Moscow, Pedagogika, 1989. 190 p. (In Russian.)

15. Biggs J. What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 2012, vol. 31, is. 1, p. 39–55. DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2012.642839

16. Belova E. K. Taksonomiya urovnej tselej uchebnoj deyatel’nosti i ee uchet pri didakticheskom proektirovanii [Educational activity goal level taxonomy and its registration at didactic designing]. Problemi іnzhenerno-pedagogіchnoї osvіti — Problems of Engineering and Pedagogical Education, 2007, no. 17, p. 227–240. (In Russian.)

17. Merkulova S. K probleme otsenki kompetentnosti [To the problem of competency assessment]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii — Higher Education in Russia, 2008, no. 2, p. 163–165. (In Russian.)

18. Menzul E. V., Ryazantseva N. M., Moiseeva O. N. Sovremennye obrazovatel’nye tekhnologii [Modern educational technology]. Samara, SamSMU, 2010. 45 p. (In Russian.)

19. Atanov G. A. Deyatel’nostnyj podkhod v obuchenii [Action approach in learning]. Donetsk, EАI-press, 2001. 160 p. (In Russian.)

20. Ilyasov I. I., Galatenko N. A. Proektirovanie kursa obucheniya po uchebnoj distsipline [Designing a training course in a subject matter]. Moscow, Logos, 1994. 205 p. (In Russian.)

21. Anikieva M. A. Metodika rascheta vremeni dlya osvoeniya uchebnogo materiala [Methods of time calculation for learning the educational material]. International Journal of Advanced Studies, 2018, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 74–90. (In Russian.) DOI: 10.12731/2227-930X-2018-2-74-90

22. eKursy. Sistema ehlektronnogo obucheniya SFU [eCourses. SFU e-learning system]. (In Russian.) Available at: https://e.sfu-kras.ru/


Review

For citations:


Anikieva M.A. Measuring the achievements of student for creating the individual training schedule in the electronic environment. Informatics and education. 2020;(4):46-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2020-35-4-46-52

Views: 435


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0234-0453 (Print)
ISSN 2658-7769 (Online)