Preview

Informatics and education

Advanced search

THE EXPERIENCE OF DUAL DIPLOMA MASTER'S EDUCATION IN UNIVERSITIES OF RUSSIA AND KAZAKHSTAN

https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2018-33-8-5-10

Abstract

The article describes the experience of creating original international Russian-Kazakhstan model of dual diploma master's education based on the development and implementation of combined educational programs on the basis of two different, but similar in the direction of training educational programs: the Russian master's program “Information technologies in education” in the direction “Pedagogical education” and the Kazakhstan master's program “Information systems” in the direction “Technical sciences and technologies”. The annotations of the content of academic disciplines that are mutually credited to the students in parallel master's programs are given. Based on the analysis of the long experience in the implementation of the dual diploma master's educational programs, a conclusion is made about assessing the feasibility of this model of the dual diploma master's education, and the organizational and financial-economic aspects of the implementation of this approach based on the use of advanced distance learning technologies are touched upon.

About the Authors

M. P. Lapchik
Omsk State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Advanced Doctor in Pedagogic Sciences, Professor, Academician of the Russian Academy of Education, Head of the Department of Informatics and Informatics Teaching Methods of Omsk State Pedagogical University;
644099, Russia, Omsk, nab. Tukhachevskogo, 14


Zh. K. Nurbekova
L. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University
Russian Federation

Advanced Doctor in Pedagogic Sciences, Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Information Technologies of L. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University;
010008, Kazakhstan, Astana, ul. Pushkina, 11, building 2



M. I. Ragulina
Omsk State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Advanced Doctor in Pedagogic Sciences, Professor, Professor at the Department of Informatics and Informatics Teaching Methods of Omsk State Pedagogical University;
644099, Russia, Omsk, nab. Tukhachevskogo, 14


References

1. Zamora G. L., Fabregas Janeiro M. G., Nuсode la Parra P. Does participation in international master dual degree programs improve students’ intercultural competence? // British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science. 2015. Vol. 8. Is. 3. P. 167–174.

2. Guri-Rosenblit S., Gros B. E-learning: confusing terminology, research gaps and inherent challenges // International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education. 2011. Vol. 25. No. 1. http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/ view/729/1206

3. Mohr A. T., Holtbrügge D., Berg N. Learning style preferences and the perceived usefulness of e-learning // Teaching in Higher Education. 2012. Vol. 17. Is. 3. P. 1–14. DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2011.640999}

4. Ravenscroft A. Designing e-learning interaction in the 21st century: revisiting and rethinking the role of theory // European Journal of Education. 2001. Vol. 36. No. 2. http:// www.qou.edu/home/sciResearch/pdf/eLearningResearchs/ designingElearning.pdf

5. Zabotkina V. Rationales of internationalization: Rethinking academic mobility // Internationalisation in higher education: Evaluating concepts, challenges and strategies (25–26 April, 2013). PRADEC Conference Proceedings. Vol 2. Is. 1. August 2013. P. 81–86.

6. Obst D., Kuder M., Banks C. Joint and double degree programs in the global context: Report on the international survey. Institute of International Education and the Freie Universität Berlin, 2011. P. 24. https://oead.at/fileadmin/ Dokumente/oead.at/KIM/Veranstaltungen/2015/HE_Talks_ on_International_Mobility/Joint_Double_Degree_Programs_ In_The_Global_Context_-_Survey_Report.pdf

7. Catherall P. Delivering e-learning for information services in higher education. Chandos Publishing, 2004.

8. Федорова Н. М. Сетевая магистерская программа: замысел, реализация, социальные эффекты // Известия Российского государственного педагогического университета им. А. И. Герцена. 2015. No 177. С. 114–119. https://lib.herzen.spb.ru/media/magazines/contents/1/177/ fedorova_177_114_119.pdf

9. Tereseviciene M., Volungeviciene A., Dauksiene E. Virtual mobility for teachers and students in higher education. Comparative research study on virtual mobility. Kaunas: Vytauto Didziojo universitetas, 2011. 120 p. http://www. teacamp.eu/sites/default/files/Teacamp_book_final_final20110606.pdf

10. Певзнер М. Н., Шерайзина Р. М., Петряков П. А. Поиск инновационных стратегий проектирования междисциплинарных магистерских программ // Человек и образование: Академический вестник Института педагогического образования и образования взрослых РАО. 2013. No 4 (37). С. 16–22.

11. Hoffman D. M. Changing academic mobility. Patterns and international migration. What will academic mobility mean in the 21st century? // Journal of Studies in International Education published online. 2008. Vol. 13. P. 34–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1028315308321374

12. Teichler U. International student mobility in Europe in the context of the Bologna Process // Journal of International Education and Leadership. 2012. Vol. 2. Is. 1. http:// www.jielusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/InternationalStudent-Mobility-in-Europe-in-the-Context-of-the-BolognaProcess1.pdf

13. Воробьева И. М. Академическая мобильность студентов как важный инструмент формирования глобальной образовательной среды в российском вузе // Молодой ученый. 2015. No 10 (90). С. 113–115.

14. Акулова О. В., Харитонова О. В. Сетевые магистерские программы: инновационный опыт Герценовского университета // Universum: Вестник Герценовского университета. 2013. No 1. С. 43–50.

15. Нефедова Л. В., Нефедова М. И. Реализация совместных образовательных программ как механизм гарантии качества образования // Тезисы Международной научно-практической конференции «Гарантии качества профессионального образования» (г. Барнаул, 23 апреля 2010 года). Барнаул: АГТУ им. И. И. Ползунова, 2010. С. 77–80. http://elib.altstu.ru/disser/conferenc/2010/01/ pdf/077nefedova.pdf

16. Suleymenov Y. Z., Kulevskaya Y. G. Training topqualification specialists for innovative development of Kazakhstan // The materials of the International Applied Science Conference “Training Top-Qualification Academic Staff in the Conditions of Innovative Economy Development. The Regional, Trans-Regional and International Aspects” (Minsk, May 30 — June 1, 2007). Minsk, 2007.

17. Andreeva N. M., Artyukhov I. P., Myagkova E. G., Pak N. I., Akkasynova Z. K. Organizing blended learning for students on the basis of learning roadmaps // Journal of Social Studies Education Research. 2018. Vol. 9. No. 2. P. 47–64. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1181973.pdf

18. McGarr O., O’Brien J. Teacher professional development and ICT: an investigation of teachers studying a postgraduate award in ICT in education // Irish Educational Studies. 2007. Vol. 26. No. 2. P. 145–162. DOI: 10.1080/03323310701295872

19. Morze N., Buinytska O., Grinchenko B. Corporate standard of ICT competence of masters // Інформацiйнi технологiї в освiтi. 2014. No. 19. P. 9–21. DOI: 10.14308/ ite000480

20. Taspolat A. Perception of prospective teachers competencies about information and communication technology // Eastern Mediterranean University. http://hdl.handle. net/11129/2997

21. Lapchik M., Nurbekova Z., Ragulina M., Nurbekov B., Jarassova G. The model of two-degree education based on various master’s programs // Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 2015. Vol. 6. No. 6. P. 559–564. DOI: 10.5901/ mjss.2015.v6n6p559


Review

For citations:


Lapchik M.P., Nurbekova Zh.K., Ragulina M.I. THE EXPERIENCE OF DUAL DIPLOMA MASTER'S EDUCATION IN UNIVERSITIES OF RUSSIA AND KAZAKHSTAN. Informatics and education. 2018;(8):5-10. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2018-33-8-5-10

Views: 631


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0234-0453 (Print)
ISSN 2658-7769 (Online)