Preview

Informatics and education

Advanced search

DYNAMIC ADAPTIVE TESTS OF IDENTIFICATION OF THE STRUCTURE OF ANATOMICAL OBJECTS

https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2018-33-7-51-56

Abstract

Problem and purpose. The requirements for the results of professional training of students of medical educational institutions have actualized the problem of dynamic adaptive testing of the enabling conditions for the acquisition by students of the experience of independent learning activity in electronic problematic environments of anatomical objects of the human body. The purpose of the article is to identify and substantiate the possibilities of increasing the teaching potential of students on the basis of the use of computerized dynamic adaptive tests for the identification of complex anatomical objects in conditions of estimated feedback.
The methodology of the research is the analysis of the psychological and pedagogical theory and the generalization of the results of scientific research of domestic and foreign scientists reflecting the ideas of actual approaches to dynamic adaptive testing in education, namely: the activity approach that implements developmental learning in the conditions of instructive feedback; the environmental approach, on the basis of training with reinforcement, in the context of evaluative feedback.
Results. Based on the analysis of educational theory and practice, the basic didactic principles of dynamic adaptive testing of the process of self-learning in the electronic problematic environment of anatomical objects are formulated: evaluative feedback, thesaurus, interactivity, iterativity, semiotic diversity, monitoring, instability, uncertainty. Based on these principles, computerized dynamic adaptive tests-simulators for the identification of anatomical objects have been developed, a methodological model has been created for diagnosing the procedural characteristics of students’ learning activities, and the effectiveness of dynamic adaptive testing in the formation and development of cognitive abilities of students has been proved.
The conclusion. The article describes the implementation of the ideas of dynamic adaptive testing in enriching the didactic potential of the student’s productive learning activity. The proposed model of dynamic adaptive testing of the structure of anatomical objects, through a combination of self-learning activities and external management in the context of evaluative feedback, allows students to be included in independent educational activities and to diagnose changes in its procedural characteristics. The results and conclusions allow us to develop the basic principles of dynamic adaptive testing.

About the Authors

P. P. Dyachuk
Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after V. P. Astafyev
Russian Federation

Advanced Doctor in Pedagogic Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor at the Department of Mathematics and Methods of Teaching Mathematics

660049, Russia, Krasnoyarsk, ul. Perensona, 7



P. P. Dyachuk (Jr.)
Siberian Federal University
Russian Federation

Ph. D. of Pedagogic Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor at the Department of Information Systems

660041, Russia, Krasnoyarsk, Svobodny pr., 79



I. V. Shadrin
Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after V. P. Astafyev
Russian Federation

Ph. D. of Engineering Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor at the Department of Technology

660049, Russia, Krasnoyarsk, ul. Perensona, 7



I. P. Peregudovа
Siberian Federal University
Russian Federation

Postgraduate at the Department of Information Systems

660041, Russia, Krasnoyarsk, Svobodny pr., 79



References

1. Luria A. R. The Working Brain. New York: Basic Books, 1973.

2. Haywood C. H., Lidz C. S. Dynamic assessment in practice: Clinical and educational applications. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

3. Poehner M. E. Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting second language development. Berlin, Germany: Springer Publishing, 2008.

4. Sternberg R. J., Grigorenko E. L. Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

5. Feuerstein R., Rand Y., Hoffman M. The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device, theory, instruments, and techniques. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press, 1979.

6. Feuerstein R., Feuerstein R. S., Falik L. H., Rand Y. The dynamic assessment of cognitive modifiability: the learning propensity assessment device: Theory, instruments, and techniques. Jerusalem: ICELP Press, 2002.

7. Куравский Л. С., Марголис А. А., Мармалюк П. А., Панфилова А. С., Юрьев Г. А. Математические аспекты концепции адаптивного тренажера // Психологическая наука и образование. 2016. Т. 21. № 2. C. 84–95. doi: 10.17759/pse.2016210210

8. Lidz C. S., Elliott J. G. Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2014.

9. Cotrus A., Stanciu C. A study on dynamic assessment techniques, as a method of obtaining a high level of learning potential, untapped by conventional assessment // ScienceDirect 5th World Conference on Educational Sciences — WCES 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.622

10. Carroll R. A., Kodak T. Using instructive feedback to increase response variability during intraverbal training for children with autism spectrum disorder // The Analysis of Verbal Behavior. 2015. No. 31. P. 183–199.

11. Vygotsky L. S. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.

12. Wu H. M., Kuo B. C., Yang J. M. Evaluating knowledge structure based adaptive testing algorithms and system development // Educational Technology & Society. 2012. No.15 (2). P. 73–88.

13. Wu H. M., Kuo B. C., Wang S. C. Computerized Dynamic Adaptive Tests with Immediately Individualized Feedback for Primary School Mathematics Learning //Educational Technology & Society. 2017. No. 20 (1). P. 61–72.

14. Пиаже Ж. Психология интеллекта / пер. А. М.Пятигорского. СПб.: Питер, 2003.

15. Саттон Р. С., Барто Э. Г. Адаптивные и интеллектуальные системы. Обучение с подкреплением. М.:БИНОМ. Лаборатория знаний, 2014.

16. Дьячук П. П., Суровцев В. М. Компьютерные системы автоматического регулирования учебных действий // Информатика и образование. 2010. № 4. С. 115–118.

17. Дьячук П. П., Карабалыков С. А., Масленников И. А. Бифуркация учебной деятельности // Информатика и образование. 2014. № 4. С. 91–93.

18. Дьячук П. П., Дроздова Л. Н., Шадрин И. В. Система автоматического управления учебной деятельностью и ее диагностики // Информационно-управляющие системы. 2010. № 5. С. 63–69.

19. Bilich G. L., Kryzhanovsky V. A. “Atlas of human anatomy” in threevolumes. M.: GEOTAR-Media, 2013.

20. Шадрин И. В., Верещагина Т. Д., Туранова Л. М., Дьячук П.П. Динамические компьютерные тесты-тренажеры как средство освоения обучающимися деятельности по идентификации объектов // Вестник Красноярского государственного педагогического университета им. В. П. Астафьева. 2015. № 4 (34). С. 83–88.

21. Абдеев Р. Ф. Философия информационной цивилизации. М.: ВЛАДОС, 1994.

22. Ротенберг В. С., Аршанский В. В. Поисковая активность и адаптация. М.: Наука, 1982.

23. Новиков Д. А. Модели адаптации команд // Управление большими системами. Вып. 20. М.: ИПУ РАН, 2008. С. 57–76.

24. Растригин Л. А., Эренштейн М. Х. Адаптивное обучение с моделью обучаемого. Рига: Зинатне, 1988.


Review

For citations:


Dyachuk P.P., Dyachuk (Jr.) P.P., Shadrin I.V., Peregudovа I.P. DYNAMIC ADAPTIVE TESTS OF IDENTIFICATION OF THE STRUCTURE OF ANATOMICAL OBJECTS. Informatics and education. 2018;(7):51-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2018-33-7-51-56

Views: 608


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0234-0453 (Print)
ISSN 2658-7769 (Online)