Preview

Informatics and education

Advanced search

On the issue of educational and methodological information selection for implementing an adaptive learning management system: Algorithm of selecting authors of literature taking into account the emotional and psychological characteristics of users based on the ideas of academic genealogy

https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2025-40-3-69-79

Abstract

   The article is devoted to the development of a new algorithm for integrated distributed information systems, which should ensure the selection of authors of scientific and educational-methodical literature and the literature itself, taking into account the emotional and psychological characteristics of the system users based on the ideas of academic genealogy. The need to create such an algorithm is due to the fact that the currently actively developing process of transition to an information society, observed in various spheres of society, leads to quite strong changes in the field of economics, employment of the population, education, information systems for providing information. While the core of these transformations is the use of information and educational digital platforms that are adaptive to the emotional and psychological characteristics of students. The key factor that determines their success is the algorithm for selecting scientific and educational-methodical literature, taking into account the individual characteristics of students. Educational and methodological information is usually formed on the basis of new scientific results obtained during the implementation of dissertation research, while the volume of materials used in them is steadily growing according to a law close to exponential. Accordingly, the requirements for integrated distributed information systems (electronic library systems) that support the educational process are sharply increasing, which requires the creation of a fundamentally new algorithm. The article lists limitations and recommendations for the practical implementation of the algorithm proposed in the work.

About the Authors

S. G. Grigoriev
Moscow City Pedagogical University
Russian Federation

Sergey G. Grigoriev, Corresponding Member of the RAE, Doctor of Sciences (Engineering), Professor, Professor at the Department

Institute of Digital Education; Department of IT, Management and Technology

Moscow



I. M. Lerner
Akmulla Bashkir State Pedagogical University; Kazan National Research Technical University named after A. N. Tupolev-KAI; Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
Russian Federation

Doctor of Sciences (Engineering), Senior Research Fellow, Professor, Professor at the Department

Institute of Radio Electronics, Photonics and Digital Technologies; Department of Nanotechnology in Electronics; Institute of Physics; Department of Radio Astronomy

Republic of Bashkortostan; Ufa; Republic of Tatarstan; Kazan



A. Kh. Marinosyan
Moscow City Pedagogical University
Russian Federation

Andreas Kh. Marinosyan, postgraduate student

Institute of Digital Education; Department of Education Informatisation

Moscow



M. A. Grigorieva
Moscow City Pedagogical University
Russian Federation

Marina A. Grigorieva, Candidate of Sciences (Education), Docent, Associate Professor

Institute of Digital Education; Department of IT, Management and Technology

Moscow



References

1. Grigoriev S. G., Lerner I. M., Marinosyan A. Kh., Arutyunova N. K., Grigorieva M. A. On the issue of educational and methodological information selection for implementing an adaptive learning management system: Algorithm of a priori authors classification. Informatics and Education. 2025;40(2):66–78. (In Russian.) DOI: 10.32517/0234-0453-2025-40-2-66-78.

2. Lerner I. M., Karelina E. A., Grigoryev S. G., Baikov F. Yu., Dymkova S. S., Ilyin V. I. The model of information resources selection based on the generation theory, scientometrics and personality study factor method as an instrument for developing global digital platforms. Scientific and Technical Libraries. 2024;(1):15–50. (In Russian.) EDN: RIJNNF. DOI: 10.33186/1027-3689-2024-1-15-50.

3. Yoo Y., Henfridsson O., Lyytinen K. Research commentary — The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Research. 2010;21(4):724–735. DOI: 10.1287/isre.1100.0322.

4. Edelman D., Singer M. Competing on customer journeys: You have to create new value at every step. Harvard Business Review. 2015;93(11):88–98.

5. Smirnov E. N., Lukyanov S. A. Development of the global market of Artificial Intelligence systems. Economy of Regions. 2019;15(1):57–69. (In Russian.) EDN: MWOTZQ. DOI: 10.17059/2019-1-5.

6. Morozova Yu. A. Data mining of vacancy data to identify the current labor market needs. Informatics and Education. 2022;37(5):26-37. (In Russian.) EDN: KQKIRJ. DOI: 10.32517/0234-0453-2022-37-5-26-37.

7. Graham M., Hjorth I., Lehdonvirta V. Digital labour and development: Impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research. 2017;23(2):135–162. DOI: 10.1177/1024258916687250.

8. Cekha V. V. Digital platforms as new subjects in education. Science and School. 2021;(3):81–93. (In Russian.) EDN: WALMTX. DOI: 10.31862/1819-463X-2021-3-81-93.

9. Pavlicheva E. N., Zhiltsov V. A. Virtual reality platforms to support decision-making in multilevel educational systems. Scientific and Technical Libraries. 2023;(7):64–81. (In Russian.) EDN: CXPKOF. DOI: 10.33186/1027-3689-2023-7-64-81.

10. Yakunin Yu. Yu., Shestakov V. N., Liksonova D. I., Danichev A. A. Predicting student performance using machine learning tools. Informatics and Education. 2023;38(4):28–43. (In Russian.) EDN: HPHLQH. DOI: 10.32517/0234-0453-2023-38-4-28-43

11. Aldunin D. A. A model of recommendation service architecture for the formation of an individual educational trajectory for self-paced massive open online courses studying. Informatics and Education. 2024;39(1):74–83. (In Russian.) EDN: IBBOLE. DOI: 10.32517/0234-0453-2024-39-1-74-83.

12. Kuznetsova Yu. A. Simulation modeling of the strategic development of the higher education system of the Russian Federation. Informatics and Education. 2023;38(6):32–44. (In Russian.) EDN: PMBBMF. DOI: 10.32517/0234-0453-2023-38-6-32-44.

13. Lakizo I. G. Modern foreign studies of information needs of students of higher educational institutions (review of publications). Scientific and Technical Libraries. 2023;(5):112–132. (In Russian.) EDN: DNTBVN. DOI: 10.33186/1027-3689-2023-5-112-132.

14. Sabitov R. A., Smirnova G. S., Elizarova N. Yu., Sabitov Sh. R., Eponeshnikov A. V., Grigoriev I. S., Kutdusov А. А. Transformation of approaches in teaching information technologies to engineering students. Informatics and Education. 2023;38(4):5–13. (In Russian.) EDN: OKKWVQ. DOI: 10.32517/0234-0453-2023-38-4-5-13.

15. Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science. 1972;178(4060):471–479. DOI: 10.1126/science.178.4060.471.

16. Garfield E. Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. New York, John Wiley & Sons; 1979. 274 p.

17. Rousseau R., Zhang L. Betweenness centrality and Q-measures in directed valued networks. Scientometrics. 2008;75(3):575–590. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1772-2.

18. Roth C., Wu J., Lozano S. Assessing impact and quality from local dynamics of citation networks. Journal of Informetrics. 2012;6(1):111–120. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2011.08.005.

19. Small H. Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 1973;24(4):265–269. DOI: 10.1002/asi.4630240406.

20. Leydesdorff L. The evolutionary dynamics of discursive knowledge. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of scientific and scholarly communication. Cham, Springer; 2021. 248 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-59951-5.

21. Daraio C., Di Leo S., Leydesdorff L. A heuristic approach based on Leiden rankings to identify outliers: evidence from Italian universities in the European landscape. Scientometrics. 2023;128(1):483–510. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04551-y.

22. Leydesdorff L., Bornmann L. Disruption indices and their calculation using web-of-science data: Indicators of historical developments or evolutionary dynamics? Journal of Informetrics. 2021;15(4):1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2021.101219.

23. Funk R. J., Owen-Smith J. A dynamic network measure of technological change. Management Science. 2017;63(3):791–817. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2366.

24. Wu S., Wu Q. A confusing definition of disruption. SocArXiv Papers. 2019. DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/d3wpk.

25. Zhang L., Leydesdorff L. The scientometric measurement of interdisciplinarity and diversity in the research portfolios of Chinese Universities. Journal of Data and Information Science. 2021;6(4):13–35. DOI: 10.2478/jdis-2021-0027.

26. Dymkova S. S. Methods and procedural model for increasing the publication activity of scientific organizations based on scientometric tools : Cand. eng. sci. diss.: 05.25.05. Moscow; 2022. 170 p. (ШIn Russian.) EDN: MHQRNL.

27. Lerner I. M., Marinosyan A. Kh., Grigoriev S. G., Yusupov A. R., Anikyeva M. A., Garifullina G. A. An approach to the formation of intellectual academic genealogy using large language models. Electromagnetic Waves and Electronic Systems. 2024;29(4):108–120. (In Russian.) EDN: BSNYZW. DOI: 10.18127/j15604128-202404-09.

28. Kiss T., Strunk J. Unsupervised multilingual sentence boundary detection. Computational Linguistics. 2006;32(4):485–525. DOI: 10.1162/coli.2006.32.4.485.

29. Müller T., Cotterel R., Fraser A., Schütze H. Joint lemmatization and morphological tagging with lemming. Proc. of the 2015 Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Lisbon, Portugal, Association for Computational Linguistics; 2015:2268–2274. DOI: 10.18653/v1/D15-1272.

30. Mitrofanova O. A. Probabilistic modeling of the topics of Russian-language text corpora using the computer tool GenSim. Proc. of the International Conf. “Corpus Linguistics — 2015”. St. Petersburg, Publising House of the Saint-Petersburg University; 2015:332–343. (In Russian.) EDN: UDQIRZ.

31. Sokolova E. V., Mitrofanova O. A. Automatic keyphrase extraction by applying KEA to Russian texts. Kompyuternaya lingvistika i vychislitelnye ontologii. 2017;(1):157–165. (In Russian.) EDN: YWIPAM. DOI: 10.17586/2541-9781-2017-1-157-165.

32. Kapustina A. N. Multifactorial personality technique of R. Cattell. St. Petersburg, Rech; 2001. 112 p. (In Russian.)

33. Wentzel E. S. Probability theory. Moscow, Nauka; 1969. 576 p. (In Russian.)


Review

For citations:


Grigoriev S.G., Lerner I.M., Marinosyan A.Kh., Grigorieva M.A. On the issue of educational and methodological information selection for implementing an adaptive learning management system: Algorithm of selecting authors of literature taking into account the emotional and psychological characteristics of users based on the ideas of academic genealogy. Informatics and education. 2025;40(3):69-79. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2025-40-3-69-79

Views: 85


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0234-0453 (Print)
ISSN 2658-7769 (Online)