Technology of creating an innovative textbook for teacher education system
https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2024-39-4-51-61
Abstract
The transformation of education, caused by the constantly changing demands of society and the avalanche growth of information, necessitates the search for new means of training future teachers, focused on the formation of universal qualities of a specialist. The creation of psycho-pedagogical classes requires expanded research into ways to improve pedagogical training with continuity at all levels, starting from school. Considering the focus on professional training, it is important to model the structure and content of educational tools that allow forming not only subject knowledge but also the readiness of future teachers to “learn to teach” adequately to the cognitive characteristics of modern students and the trends in the formation of digital content.
The aim of the article is to substantiate the method of creating end-to-end inversion textbooks that allow forming and developing the readiness to learn to teach in students planning their future professional activities in the educational field (by the example of studying the topic of the informatics course “Information and information processes”).
The literature analysis allowed us to identify three tools for modeling the format of presentation and structuring of the textbook content: the “inverted” or inversion (question-task) format of the structural composition of educational content; the end-to-end or vertical selection of educational content according to the principle of “vertical lever”, the principle of “transparent” box” based on structural mental diagrams for visualizing all components of educational material (theory, tasks, control methods). Using the example of the topic “Information and information processes”, the article shows the technology of applying these tools in compiling of innovative teaching resources is shown.
An expert assessment of the created textbook confirmed the possibility and feasibility of its use in psycho-pedagogical classes and pedagogical universities for training, self-study, and self-control of students.
About the Authors
D. A. BarkhatovaRussian Federation
Daria A. Barkhatova - Candidate of Sciences (Education), Associate Professor at the Department of Informatics and Information Technologies in Education, Institute of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics.
Krasnoyarsk
A. N. Maryasova
Russian Federation
Alina N. Maryasova - a 1st year master’s student of the educational program “Pedagogical Education”, profile “Informatics and Digital Transformation of Education”.
Krasnoyarsk
N. I. Pak
Russian Federation
Nikolay I. Pak - Doctor of Sciences (Education), Candidate of Sciences (Physics and Mathematics), Professor, Head of the Department of Informatics and Information Technologies in Education, Institute of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics.
Krasnoyarsk
Yu. V. Faut
Russian Federation
Yulia V. Faut - Assistant at the Department of Informatics and Information Technologies in Education, Institute of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics.
Krasnoyarsk
References
1. Pak N. Mental technology of digital transformation of education. Proc. 2nd Int. Sci. Conf. on Advances in Science, Engineering, and Digital Education (ASEDU-II-2021). Krasnoyarsk, AIP Publishing; 2022;2647(A):40023. EDN: JNXYQR. DOI: 10.1063/5.0104033.
2. Neisser U. Cognition and reality. The meaning and principles of cognitive psychology. Moscow, Progress; 1981. 232 p. (In Russian.)
3. Solso R. Cognitive psychology. Saint Petersburg, Piter; 2006. 589 p. (In Russian.)
4. Chernyshev D. A. How do people think? Moscow, Mann, Ivanov and Ferber; 2013. 304 p. (In Russian.)
5. Eppler M. J. A comparison between concept maps, mind maps, conceptual diagrams, and visual metaphors as complementary tools for knowledge construction and sharing. Information Visualization. 2006;5(3):202–210. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500131.
6. Asaulenko E. V. Artificial intelligence from the position of mind scheme. Open Education. 2014;(4(105)):50–54. (In Russian.) EDN: SJCGFJ. DOI: 10.21686/1818-4243-2014-4(105-50-54.
7. Asaulenko E. V. Automated system for diagnosing the ability to solve computational problems based on structural and mental schemes. RUDN Journal of Informatization in Education. 2020;17(1):49–62. (In Russian.) EDN: KPHNEA. DOI: 10.22363/2312-8631-2020-17-1-49-62.
8. West D. M. Using technology to personalize learning and assess students in real-time. Washington, Center for technology innovations at BROOKINGS; 2011. 19 p.
9. Gabdulganeeva D. M., Mamontova M. D. Learning the decision and diagnostic the progress of math problem solving based on mental schemes. Actual Problems of Informatics and Information Technologies in Education: Proc. All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conf. with International Participation in the Context of the 16th Int. Scientific and Practical Forum of Students, Postgraduates and Young Scientists “Youth and Science of the XXI century”. Krasnoyarsk, KSPU named after V. P. Astafyev; 2016:51–54. (In Russian.) Available at: https://elib.kspu.ru/document/17540
10. Bray B. A., McClaskey K. A. Make learning personal: The what, who, wow, when, and why. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, Corwin; 2014. 288 p.
11. Barkhatova D., Khegay L., Pak N., Narchuganov K. Software-instrumental environment for creating cognitive learning tools. Proc. 3d Int. Sci. Conf. on Advances in Science, Engineering, and Digital Education (ASEDU-III-2022). Melville, AIP Publishing; 2024;2969:040006. EDN: VBHXQI. DOI: 10.1063/5.0181807.
12. Lomasko P. S., Simonova A. L., Lisman A. M. The possibility of including “inverted” educational resources in the professional training of future teachers of mathematics and computer science. Open Education. 2022;26(5):40–50. (In Russian.) EDN: PLYYDE. DOI: 10.21686/1818-4243-2022-5-40-50.
13. Butorin D. N. Automation program for recognition of algorithm solution of mathematic task. Open Education. 2014;(5(106)):28–34. (In Russian.) EDN: SUJEAN. DOI: 10.21686/1818-4243-2014-5(106-28-34.
14. Slepchenko N. N., Tsibulsky G. M., Yamskikh T. N. From learner model to his adaptation in learning management systems. Informatization of Education and Science. 2018;(1(37)):68–79. (In Russian.) EDN: YKWHIA.
15. Barkhatova D. A., Khegay L. B., Pak N. I. Pedagogical design of “inverted” learning resources for home study. Perspectives of Science and Education. 2022;(6(60)):244–262. (In Russian.) EDN: YCQDYI. DOI: 10.32744/pse.2022.6.14.
16. Pushkareva T. P. Scientific and methodological foundations of teaching mathematics to future science teachers from the perspective of the information approach: Doc. ped. sci. diss. author’s abstract: 13.00.02. Krasnoyarsk; 2013. 39 p. (In Russian.) EDN: ZOZCCB.
17. Smantser A. P. Theory and practice of implementing continuity in teaching schoolchildren and students. Minsk, Belarusian State University; 2011. 288 p. (In Russian.) EDN: RLWHNJ.
18. Byvsheva M. V. Theoretical aspects of continuity in the education system. Psikhologiya i Pedagogika: Metodika i Problemy Prakticheskogo Primeneniya. 2011;(22):259–263. (In Russian.) EDN: RNFBWL.
19. Pushkareva T. P. Selection of the mathematics education content based on the vertical model of continuous mathematical activity of students. Vyssheye Obrazovaniye Segodnya. 2010;(12):51–54. (In Russian.) EDN: NCHNSB.
20. Uvaeva E. V. Classroom-lesson system in pedagogical theories of Ya. A. Komensky, I. F. Herbart, K. D. Ushinsky and domestic didactics from 1917 to the 1990s: Textbook. Biysk, BPSU named after V. M. Shukshin; 2008. 78 p. (In Russian.)
21. Kozhevnikova M. N. The concept of growth-development in Dewey’s philosophy of education as a method and a result. Philosophy of Education. 2013;(5(50)):122–130. (In Russian.) EDN: RTMQXR.
22. Novak V. N. Learn to teach to learn. Bulletin of the Military Education. 2017;(4(7)):116–119. (In Russian.) EDN: ZMMGVN.
23. Peshkova N. P. About text, its sense and individual strategies of comprehension (based on comparative analysis of two theoretical and experimental researches). Vestnik Permskogo Natsional’nogo Issledovatel’skogo Politekhnicheskogo Universiteta. Problemy Yazykoznaniya i Pedagogiki. 2016;(4):8–18. (In Russian.) EDN: XRFOBJ. DOI: 10.15593/2224-9389/2016.4.1.
24. He F., Miao X., Wu B., Yao S. Using mind map as learning tool in ‘data structure’ teaching. Proc. IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (CIT 2014). Xi’an, China, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.; 2014:761–764. DOI: 10.1109/CIT.2014.34.
25. Hodis F. A., Hodis G. M. Key factors that influence students’ motivation to learn: Implications for teaching. Set: Research Information for Teachers. 2022;(2):37–41. DOI: 10.18296/set.1509.
26. Asaulenko E. V. Modeling of the mental schemes of ability to solve computing tasks on the example of physical tasks. Actual Problems of Informatics and Information Technologies in Education: Proc. 3d All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conf. with International Participation in the Context of the 19th Int. Scientific and Practical Forum of Students, Postgraduates and Young Scientists “Youth and Science of the XXI century”. Krasnoyarsk, KSPU named after V. P. Astafyev; 2018:15–19. (In Russian.) EDN: YMGKYP.
27. Asaulenko E. V. Modeling the structure of student’s knowledge when teaching solving computational problems. Modern Programming: Proc. 1th Int. Scientific and Practical Conf. Nizhnevartovsk, Nizhnevartovsk State University; 2018:88–92. (In Russian.) EDN: YUGQDB.
28. Minto B. Golden rules of Harvard and McKinsey. Magic pyramid rules for business writing. Moscow, ROSMENPRESS; 2004. 192 p. (In Russian.)
Review
For citations:
Barkhatova D.A., Maryasova A.N., Pak N.I., Faut Yu.V. Technology of creating an innovative textbook for teacher education system. Informatics and education. 2024;39(4):51-61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2024-39-4-51-61