Preview

Informatics and education

Advanced search

Digital transformation of the quality management process of intermediate certification of students

https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2023-38-3-64-77

Abstract

The article proposes a technology for the digital transformation of the quality management process of intermediate certification.
The analysis of experience in creating and implementing models, technologies, and systems that implement the tasks of information support of the process of intermediate certification is carried out. Based on the analysis, the authors present their version of the problem of quality management of the process of intermediate certification in an educational institution in the context of digital transformation.
The digital transformation of the quality management process of the intermediate certification is interpreted as the transformation of the entire process of intermediate certification, the technology of its organization and conduction, aimed at design and implementation of an information management system in the framework of digital policy of educational institutions which solve the problem of quality information support of intermediate certification (ensuring relevance, reliability, integrity, legal correctness, addressability, information protection) and the problem of managing of the process of intermediate certification (planning, monitoring, control, decision-making to improve), minimizing corruption risks and forming a digital trail of students.
On the example of the Siberian State University of Geosystems and Technologies, the experience of implementing the technology of information support of intermediate certification and the formation of a student’s digital footprint is presented. The technology is distinguished by the presence of the function of “self-control” of the quality of information, which minimizes various risks of loss of information quality, including corruption.
Based on the experience of automating the quality management process of interim certification in various educational institutions under different learning models (linear, credit, mixed), the authors presented a number of recommendations that can be useful in the process of digital transformation of educational institutions.

About the Authors

E. V. Shevchuk
Siberian State University of Geosystems and Technologies
Russian Federation

Elena V. Shevchuk, Candidate of Sciences (Engineering), Docent, Associate Professor at the Department of Higher Mathematics, Institute of Geodesy and Management; Director of Education Department

Novosibirsk



A. V. Shpak
Siberian State University of Geosystems and Technologies
Russian Federation

Andrei V. Shpak, Candidate of Sciences (Engineering), Docent, Associate Professor at the Department of Higher Mathematics, Institute of Geodesy and Management; Head of the Scientific and Technical Library

Novosibirsk



References

1. Troyan L. A., Kravchenko I. A. The modern paradigm and components for the modernization of higher education. Education and Self Development. 2021;16(3):110–114. (In Russian.) EDN: FNMAZU. DOI: 10.26907/esd.16.3.10

2. Levina E. Yu. Digitalization condition or epoch of development higher education system? Kazan Pedagogical Journal. 2019;(5(136)):4–9. (In Russian.) EDN: AQFABV. DOI: 10.34772/KPJ.2019.136.5.001

3. Ignatova N. Yu. Education in the Digital Age. Nizhny Tagil, Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin; 2017. 128 p. (In Russian.) EDN: ZVIWNP

4. Obukhov A. S., Tomilina M. V. The development of digital educational technologies in Russia before the pandemic: History and peculiarities of the EdTech industry. Informatics and Education. 2021;36(8):52–61. (In Russian.) EDN: HSLLIE. DOI: 10.32517/0234-0453-2021-36-8-52-61

5. Shaugaraeva D. I., Burtsev D. S., Gavrilyuk E. S. Problems of educational process management when using digital tools in higher education. Scientific Journal NRU ITMO. Series “Economics and Environmental Management”. 2020;(2):121–130. (In Russian.) EDN: KFUIKO. DOI: 10.17586/2310-1172-2020-13-2-121-130

6. Uvarov A. Yu., Gable E., Dvoretskaya I. V., Zaslavsky I. M., Karlov I. A., Mertsalova T. A., Sergomanov P. A., Frumin I. D. Difficulties and prospects of digital transformation of education. Ed. by A. Yu. Uvarov, I. D. Frumin. Moscow, HSE Publishing House; 2019. 344 p. (In Russian.) EDN: ANYGHO. DOI: 10.17323/978-5-7598-1990-5

7. Rymkevich Ya. A. Digital transformation of documentation support of educational organization (system of documentation for organizational support). Education and Law. 2021;(10):251–255. (In Russian.) EDN: BFQSUE. DOI: 10.24412/2076-1503-2021-10-252-255

8. Al-Abdullatif A. M., Gameil A. A. The effect of digital technology integration on students’ academic performance through project-based learning in an E-learning environment. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning. 2021;16(11):189–210. DOI: 10.3991/ijet.v16i11.19421

9. Siemens G., Gašević D., Dawson S. Preparing for the digital university: A review of the history and current state of distance, blended, and online learning. Athabasca Canada, Athabasca University Press; 2015. 234 p. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3515.8483

10. Börnert-Ringleb M., Casale G., Hillenbrand C. What predicts teachers’ use of digital learning in Germany? Examining the obstacles and conditions of digital learning in special education. European Journal of Special Needs Education. 2021;36(1):80–97. DOI: 10.1080/08856257.2021.1872847

11. Markelov K. A., Polyanskaya E. V., Mineva O. K., Taran V. N. Paradigm transformation of education system in digital reality. Selected Papers of the 5th Int. Scientific and Practical Conf. “Distance Learning Technologies” (DLT 2020). Yalta, Crimea; 2020:186–198. EDN: RHZUWI. Available at: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2914/paper16.pdf

12. Stepanenko A. A., Feshchenko A. V. Digital footprint of the student: Search, analysis, interpretation. Open and Distance Education. 2017;(4):58–62. (In Russian.) EDN: ZXOZBB. DOI: 10.17223/16095944/68/9

13. Baranova E. V., Vereshchagina N. O., Shvetsov G. V. Digital tools for learning activities analysis. Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences. 2020;(198):56–65. (In Russian.) EDN: AXDDPU. DOI: 10.33910/1992-6464-2020-198-56-65

14. Zhetesova G. S., Ernazarova M. A. Automation of students knowledge at modular form of education based on the software. Fundamental Research.2014;(6-2):355–359. (In Russian.) EDN:SWOCKN

15. Vede.rnikova T. I., Rodionov А. V., Bludov V. V., Pichkur D. A. Automation of recording current academic performance of students. Baikal Research Journal. 2019;10(4):14–15. (In Russian.) EDN: BSWMUX. DOI: 10.17150/2411-6262.2019.10(4).14

16. Chuiko O. V., Belozerova S. I. Development of information system for monitoring student performance on the basis of cloud technologies. Online Journal “Naukovedenie”. 2015;7(5):239. (In Russian.) EDN: VJKSNX. DOI: 10.15862/97PVN515

17. Sakulin A. E., Shchanikov S. A. Automation of the process of processing information about students’ academic performance. Algorithms, Methods and Data Processing Systems. 2018;(2(38)):57–64. (In Russian.) EDN: FBRCZD

18. Samerkhanova E. K., Krupoderova E. P., Panova I. V. Digital resources for organizing the educational process and evaluating the achievements of students in a distance format: an overview of digital resources for distance education. Nizhny Novgorod, Mininsky University; 2020. 50 p. (In Russian.) EDN: MJAOKF. Available at: https://udsu.ru/files/obuchenie/003077-обзор_цифровых_ресурсов_compressed.pdf

19. Alkubaeva V. S., Chistozvonov A. I., Khakimzhanov A. R. Pros and cons of the electronic record book. Problems of Education Quality Management. Collection of Articles of the XIII All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference. Penza, Penza State Agrarian University; 2020:16–18. (In Russian.) EDN: MUYYQG

20. Shabanov G. A., Rastyagaev D. V. University digitalization: Reality and expectations. Higher Education Today. 2020;(1):2–7. (In Russian.) EDN: XCFPID. DOI: 10.25586/RNU.HET.20.01.P.02

21. Pashkov M. V., Pashkova V. M. Problems and risks of digitalization of higher education. Higher Education in Russia. 2022;31(3):40–57. (In Russian.) EDN: RUBCXA. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2022-31-22-3-40-57

22. Herat E. A., Shukhman A. E. Intellegent methods to predict performance of college students. Bulletin of Science and Education. 2019;(12-2):11–13. (In Russian.) EDN: WROIPQ

23. Assessment of the quality of education in the conditions of distance learning: the experience of living the pandemic by the school education systems of the post-soviet countries. Moscow, “Alex” (IP Polikanin A. A.); 2021. 390 p. (In Russian.) Available at: https://eaoko.org/upload/library/21_Distance_WEB.pdf

24. Karakozov S., Smotryaeva K., Litvinenko M., Ryzhova N., Koroleva N. Complex network models used to make decisions on optimizing regional education systems. Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Informatization of Education and E-learning Methodology: Digital Technologies in Education (IEELMDTE 2020). Krasnoyarsk, 2020:28–33. EDN: EYWKXG. Available at: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2770/paper4.pdf

25. Fernando K. F. Problems of combating corruption in the field of science and education. Modern Approaches to Combating Corruption: Trends and Prospects. Collection of Abstracts and Articles of the All-Russian Sci. Conf. with Foreign Participation. Moscow, LLC “Publishing House Tretyakov”; 2019;2:206–207. (In Russian.) EDN: KHGSFO

26. Mitin A. N. On the control over the risks of corruption in higher education. Russian Law: Education, Practice, Research. 2018;(1):13–19. (In Russian.) EDN: XQHLHV

27. Krayushkina S. V. Anti-corruption technologies in higher education (from the experience of Lev Tolstoy TSPU). Anti-corruption: Legal Support, Main Aspects and Anti-corruption Standards of Conduct in Scientific and Educational Organizations. Proc. of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conf. Saratov, Yuri Gagarin State Technical University of Saratov; 2018:157–159. (In Russian.) EDN: YBWQSN

28. Ryzhova O. A., Serdyukova L. O., Slavnetskova L. V. Overview of anti-corruption activities conducted in technical universities of the Russian Federation. Anti-corruption: Legal Support, Main Aspects and Anti-corruption Standards of Conduct in Scientific and Educational Organizations. Proc. of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conf. Saratov, Yuri Gagarin State Technical University of Saratov; 2018:190–193. (In Russian.) EDN: HRAFXR

29. Shevchuk E. V., Shpak A. V. Informational and educational environment of the university. Experience and perspectives. Innovative educational technologies. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing; 2016. 108 p. (In Russian.)

30. Shpak A. V. Monitoring learning in the information environment of the school. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing; 2017. 144 p. (In Russian.)

31. Shevchuk E. V., Shpak A. V. Experience of creating and implementing information-managing educational environment at university and features of its adaptation at lyceum. Informatics and Education. 2019;(2):47–55. (In Russian.) EDN: ZIJFUT. DOI: 10.32517/0234-0453-2019-34-2-47-55


Review

For citations:


Shevchuk E.V., Shpak A.V. Digital transformation of the quality management process of intermediate certification of students. Informatics and education. 2023;38(3):64-77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2023-38-3-64-77

Views: 327


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0234-0453 (Print)
ISSN 2658-7769 (Online)