A criterial model for assessing the quality of the digital educational environment using cloud services
https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2023-38-3-54-63
Abstract
Globalization of all spheres of activity of educational systems determines the need to create simple and accessible tools for monitoring and evaluating the quality of objects and resources. In particular, due to the need to intensify the processes of digital transformation of education, it is important to assess the quality of digital educational environments (DEE). The aim of the work is to substantiate the approach and describe the procedure for monitoring of DEE of educational institutions based on the available cloud services, providing convenient collection, accumulation, and processing of statistical and monitoring indicators.
The projective criterial model of the system of assessment and monitoring of the quality of DEE, which is based on the results of self-assessment of the educational organization and external expert evaluation, was adopted. The main feature of the model is the participation of organizations and external experts in the process of designing criterion rubrics, conducting and analyzing the results of monitoring. Yandex Forms service is used for self-assessment of DEE and expert evaluation of the educational organization website which allows converting of the collected data into spreadsheets. By combining the data and their statistical processing it is possible to obtain indicators for different slices and ratings, to conduct a summary clustering of the DEE of the studied organizations by three levels: low, average, and high.
The proposed model was implemented in the assessment of DEE practices of supplementary education for children. To determine the quantitative and qualitative indicators of the DLE and the official sites of additional education organizations we created questionnaires in Yandex Forms filled in by the representatives of the studied organizations. Pilot testing showed that the collection, processing, and delivery of monitoring data to users was technologically simple and easy.
The projective criterial model for assessing the quality of the DEE of supplementary education organizations can be used for many other studies related to criterion-based assessment activities.
Keywords
About the Authors
N. I. PakRussian Federation
Nikolai I. Pak, Doctor of Sciences (Education), Candidate of Sciences (Physics and Mathematics), Professor, Head of the Department of Informatics and Information Technologies in Education, Institute of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics
Krasnoyarsk
E. G. Doroshenko
Russian Federation
Elena G. Doroshenko, Candidate of Sciences (Education), Docent, Associate Professor at the Department of Informatics and Information Technologies in Education, Institute of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics
Krasnoyarsk
T. A. Stepanova
Russian Federation
Tatyana А. Stepanova, Candidate of Sciences (Education), Docent, Associate Professor at the Department of Informatics and Information Technologies in Education, Institute of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics
Krasnoyarsk
A. A. Syromyatnikov
Russian Federation
Alexey А. Syromyatnikov, Candidate of Sciences (Education), Docent, Associate Professor at the Department of Informatics and Information Technologies in Education, Institute of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics
Krasnoyarsk
References
1. Atanasyan S. L. The formation of an information educational environment of a pedagogical university. Doctor ped. sci. diss.: 13.00.02. Moscow, 2009. 498 p. (In Russian.) EDN: QEWDBX
2. Atanasyan S. L., Grigoriev S. G., Grinshkun V. V. Designing the structure of information educational environment of pedagogical university. Informatics and Education. 2009;(3):90–96. (In Russian.) EDN: OYXBFR
3. Sorokova M. G., Odintsova M. A., Radchikova N. P. Scale of assessing university digital educational environment (AUDEE scale). Psychological Science and Education. 2021;26(2):52–65. (In Russian.) EDN: ZUZPKK. DOI: 10.17759/pse.2021260205
4. Solovov A. V., Menshikova A. A. Models for the design and operation of digital educational environments. Higher Education in Russia. 2021;30(1):144–155. (In Russian.) EDN: NUHTID. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-1-144-155
5. Adolf V., Yanova M., Olentsova J., Zaitseva M. Monitoring of children’s independent work in the system of additional education using digital technologies. Proc. II Int. Sci. Conf. on Advances in Science, Engineering and Digital Education (ASEDU-II 2021). Melville, NY, USA, AIP Publishing LLC; 2022;2647(1):050017. DOI: 10.1063/5.0104764
6. Adolf V., Turanova L., Styugin A. Monitoring the digital educational environment in the context of education transformation. Proc. II Int. Sci. Conf. on Advances in Science, Engineering and Digital Education (ASEDU-II 2021). Melville, NY, USA, AIP Publishing LLC; 2022;2647(1):040021. DOI: 10.1063/5.0104548
7. Turanova L. M., Starichenko B. E., Styugin A. A. Monitoring the development of the digital educational environment of additional education practices for children. Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after V. P. Astafyev; 2021. 140 p. (In Russian.) EDN: URTJEX
8. Adolf V. A, Turanova L. M., Styugin A. A., Trusei I. V. Designing a system of monitoring for the digital learning environment in supplementary education for children. Siberian Pedagogical Journal. 2021;(5):7–16. (In Russian.) EDN: EAFFTM. DOI: 10.15293/1813-4718.2105.010
9. Krupa T. V., Lebedev A. A., Obukhov A. S. Organization of beyond the classroom education of schoolchildren in the digital environment: Research overview. MCU Journal of Pedagogy and Psychology. 2021;(3(57)):182–202. (In Russian.) EDN: PVRADG. DOI: 10.25688/2076-9121.2021.57.3.10
10. Kersha Yu. D., Obukhov A. S. Contemporary concepts of studying schoolchildren’s motivation and self-effectiveness within online formats implemented in additional education. Problemy sovremennogo obrazovaniya. 2021;(5):35–48. (In Russian.) EDN: EGRVDR. DOI: 10.31862/2218-8711-2021-5-35-48
11. Pinskaya M. A. Formative assessment: assessment in the classroom. Moscow, Logos; 2010. 264 p. (In Russian.)
12. Kravtsova I. L., Pinskaya M. A. Criterion-based assessment enters the practice of domestic schools. Public Education. 2012;(2(1415)):163–168. (In Russian.) EDN: OVZCZR
13. Bolotov V., Valdman I., Kovaleva G., Pinskaya M. Russian quality assessment system in education. Russian Education and Society. 2015;57(7):531–571. EDN: WRGFMH. DOI: 10.1080/10609393.2015.1096145
14. Nosova. N. V. Criterion model of intra-school management of the quality of education of high school students: Cand. ped. sci. diss.: 13.00.01. Kirov, 2009. 184 p. (In Russian.) EDN: NJJOQX
15. Novikov A., Novikov D. Quality of education: A system of internal and external evaluations. Public Education. 2007; (4(1367)):147–155. (In Russian.) EDN: IAYAQV
16. Stupnitskaya M. A. How to improve the quality of education using criteria-based assessment Public Education. 2015;(5(1448)):152–163. (In Russian.) EDN: TWGUCZ
17. Pak N. I., Barkhatova D. A., Khegai L. B. The pyramid method in the conditions of the digitalization of education. RUDN Journal of Informatization in Education. 2022;19(1):7–19. (In Russian.) EDN: BCYUGN. DOI: 10.22363/2312-8631-2022-19-1-7-19
18. Mirkin B. G. Cluster analysis methods for decision support. Moscow, HSE Publishing House; 2011. 88 p. (In Russian.) EDN: QUSUXH
19. Pak N. I. The projective approach to learning as an information process. Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after V. P. Astafyev; 2008. 112 p. (In Russian.) EDN: TPOHXL
20. Grinberg G. M, Nikolaeva Yu. S., Khegai L. B. Projectiverecursive technology of the development of electronic learning resources on the basis of a cluster approach. Bulletin of Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after V. P. Astafyev. 2017;(4(42)):36–48. (In Russian.) EDN: ZWPOGR. DOI: 10.25146/1995-0861-2017-42-4-19
Review
For citations:
Pak N.I., Doroshenko E.G., Stepanova T.A., Syromyatnikov A.A. A criterial model for assessing the quality of the digital educational environment using cloud services. Informatics and education. 2023;38(3):54-63. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2023-38-3-54-63