Preview

Informatics and education

Advanced search

Development of an applied intelligent system based on neurophysiological data to support decision-making on the organization of the educational process

https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2023-38-2-16-25

Abstract

In modern science, one of the urgent problems is the search for ways to improve the effectiveness of learning. The study of neurophysiological patterns in the formation of individual variations of cognitive activity of students at different stages of ontogenesis is an important condition for developing innovative technologies to improve the quality of the educational process. The article presents the development of an applied intelligent system that allows considering individual differences in cognitive activity of students and schoolchildren using neuroscience technologies.

The use of teaching methods and techniques is largely due to individual typological features, which can be analyzed using neurobiological indicators. Express analysis of the individual neurophysiological profile characterizes behavioral aspects of cognitive activity. With the help of an intelligent system, a set of neuro-physiological indicators of groups of students was processed to identify the influence of learning conditions on these indicators. Based on the test data sets, the system assigns learners to pairs, groups, or project teams and recommends learning tasks based on the learners’ neurophysiological profiles.

When developing the system, the basic principles of the development and use of artificial intelligence are taken into account, such as transparency of the program’s choice of the process of forming pairs and groups of learners and the criteria for selecting tasks, so the so-called weak artificial intelligence — machine learning with a teacher is used.

About the Authors

L. S. Nosova
South-Ural State Humanitarian Pedagogical University
Russian Federation

Lyudmila S. Nosova, Candidate of Sciences (Education), Docent, Deputy Dean for Academic Affairs, Associate Professor at the Department of Informatics, Information Technologies and Methods of Teaching Informatics, Faculty of Mathematics, Physics, Informatics

Chelyabinsk



N. A. Belousova
South-Ural State Humanitarian Pedagogical University
Russian Federation

Nataliya A. Belousova, Doctor of Sciences (Biology), Docent, Dean of the Faculty of Mathematics, Physics, Informatics

Chelyabinsk



Yu. V. Korchemkina
South-Ural State Humanitarian Pedagogical University
Russian Federation

Yuliya V. Korchemkina, Senior Lecturer at the Department of Informatics, Information Technologies and Methods of Teaching Informatics, Faculty of Mathematics, Physics, Informatics 

Chelyabinsk



References

1. Proydakov E. M. Current state artificial intelligence. Naukovedcheskie Issledovaniya. 2018;(1):129–153. (In Russian.) EDN: YQTRVJ. DOI: 10.31249/scis/2018.00.09

2. Lindner K.-T., Alnahdi G. H., Wahl S., Schwab S. Perceived differentiation and personalization teaching approaches in inclusive classrooms: Perspectives of students and teachers. Frontiers in Education. 2019;4:58. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2019.00058

3. Salas-Pilco S. Z., Yang Y. Artificial intelligence applications in Latin American higher education: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2022;19:21. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-022-00326-w

4. Shang H., Sivaparthipan C. B., Thanjaivadivel M. Interactive teaching using human-machine interaction for higher education systems. Computers and Electrical Engineering. 2022;100:107811. DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.107811

5. Hamim T., Benabbou F., Sael N. Student profile modeling using boosting algorithms. International Journal of WebBased Learning and Teaching Technologies. 2022;17(5):1–13. DOI: 10.4018/IJWLTT.20220901.oa4

6. Wang P., Li L., Wang R., Xie Y., Zhang J. Complexitybased attentive interactive student performance prediction for personalized course study planning. Education and Information Technologies. 2022;27(4):5471–5493. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-021-10842-3

7. Zhang Z. Application of digital intelligent communication technology in contemporary comparative education methodology. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 2022;61(6):4647–4657. DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.10.019

8. Yağci M. Educational data mining: Prediction of students’ academic performance using machine learning algorithms. Smart Learning Environments. 2022;9:11. DOI: 10.1186/s40561-022-00192-z

9. Amirov R. A., Bilalova U. M. Prospects for the introduction of artificial intelligence technologies in higher education. Administrative Consulting. 2020;(3(135)):80–88. (In Russian.) EDN: XKTQTC. DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2020-3-80-88

10. Titov V. A. Artificial intelligence in education. Priority Directions of Development of Science and Education. Collection of Articles of the XIII Int. Scientific and Practical Conf. Penza, Nauka i Prosveschenie (IP Gulyaev G. Yu.); 2020:40–43. (In Russian.) EDN: VRBPEN

11. Izmailova M. A. Opportunities and threats of artificial intelligence in education. Psychology of Education. 2020;(3):84–94. (In Russian.) EDN: FBLYFF

12. Karpukhin S. V. Current problems of using artificial intelligence in education. Vestnik of National Tourism Academy. 2019;(2(50)):40–41. (In Russian.) EDN: FBZDLK

13. Torosyan R. A. Artificial intelligence in education: Positive and negative sides. Problems and Challenges of the Digital Society: Trends in the Development of Legal Regulation of Digital Transformations. Collection of Scientific Papers on the Materials of the I Int. Scientific and Practical Conf. Saratov, Saratov State Law Academy; 2019:65–67. (In Russian.) EDN: FVBZHZ

14. Bataev A. V., Bataeva K. I. Artificial intelligence technologies in higher education institutions: A model of adaptive education. Planning and Provision of Personnel Training for the Industrial and Economic Complex of the Region. Collection of Reports of the XVIII All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conf. 2019;1:30–34. (In Russian.) EDN: MOOUEA

15. Lester B., Al-Rfou R., Constant N. The power of scale for parameter efficient prompt tuning. Proc. EMNLP 2021 Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2021:3045–3059. EDN: IQDBST. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2104.08691

16. Mantrova I. N. Methodological guide to psychophysiological and psychological diagnostics. Ivanovo, LLC “Neurosoft”; 2007. 216 p. (In Russian.) Available at: https://kognoreg.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/psyhotest2.pdf

17. Мороз М. П. Экспресс-диагностика работоспособности и функционального состояния человека. Рекомендации по допуску к работе: методическое руководство. СПб.: ИМАТОН, 2007. 40 с. [Moroz M. P. Express diagnostics of working capacity and functional state of a person. Recommendations for admission to work: A methodological guide. Saint Petersburg, IMATON; 2007. 40 p. (In Russian.)

18. Belousova N., Shefer O., Semenova M., Maltsev V., Lebedeva T., Korchemkina Yu. Neurodynamic predictors the effectiveness of cognitive activity of students ensuring healthy lifestyle. International Journal of Health Sciences. 2021;5(3):531–541. DOI: 10.53730/ijhs.v5n3.2270


Review

For citations:


Nosova L.S., Belousova N.A., Korchemkina Yu.V. Development of an applied intelligent system based on neurophysiological data to support decision-making on the organization of the educational process. Informatics and education. 2023;38(2):16-25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2023-38-2-16-25

Views: 260


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0234-0453 (Print)
ISSN 2658-7769 (Online)