Preview

Informatics and education

Advanced search

Students’ resolutions of some paradoxes of infinity in the lens of the grossone methodology

https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2023-38-1-83-91

Abstract

In the article, students’ responses to some classical paradoxes related to infinity were investigated by considering the traditional methods and later by considering a new methodology for dealing with infinity (grossone methodology) which was introduced to them briefly. Eleven students of grade 12 participated in this study.

In phase 1, the students (who study in the traditional methods) provided their intuitive resolutions to three paradoxes of infinity. In phase 2, the students were introduced to the grossone methodology after which they were asked to resolve the same paradoxes using this methodology in phase 3. After being presented by the normative and the grossone-based resolutions, the students reflected on them inwriting.

Results of this study showed that students’ intuitive solutions were similar to grossone-based solutions of the three considered paradoxes. Therefore, the students accepted those solutions.

This study shows the relevance of using an alternative method, which is the grossone methodology, in order to simplify resolutions of some paradoxical situations with infinity for undergraduate students.

About the Author

L. Nasr
Lebanese University
Lebanon

Layla Nasr, Ph.D. student, Faculty of Education

Beirut



References

1. Muir J. Of men and numbers: The Story of the Great Mathematicians. New York, Dell publishing co; 1961. 249 p.

2. Caldarola F., Cortese D., d’Atri G., Maiolo M. Paradoxes of the infinite and ontological dilemmas between ancient philosophy and modern mathematical solutions. In: Sergeyev Ya. D., Kvasov D. E. (eds) Numerical Computations: Theory and Algorithms. NUMTA 2019. Revised elected Papers, Part I: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2020;11973:358–372. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-39081-5_31

3. Dubinsky E., Weller K., McDonald M. A., Brown A. Some historical issues and paradoxes regarding the concept of infinity: An APOS-based analysis: part 1. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 2005;58(3):335–359. DOI: 10.1007/s10649-005-2531-z

4. Dubinsky E., Weller K., McDonald M. A., Brown A. Some historical issues and paradoxes regarding the concept of infinity: an APOS-based analysis: part 2. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 2005;60(2):253–266. DOI: 10.1007/s10649-005-0473-0

5. Dubinsky E., Weller K., Stenger C., Vidakovic D. Infinite iterative processes: the tennis ball problem. European Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics. 2008;1(1):99–121. Available at: https://www.ejpam.com/index.php/ejpam/article/view/48

6. Fischbein E. Tacit models of infinity. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 2001;48(2-3):309–329. DOI: 10.1023/A:1016088708705

7. Movshovitz-Hadar N., Hadass R. Preservice education of math teachers using paradoxes. Educational Studies in mathematics. 1990;21(3):265–287. DOI: 10.1007/BF00305093

8. Mamolo A., Zazkis R. Paradoxes as a window to infinity. Research in Mathematics Education. 2008;10(2):167–182. DOI: 10.1080/14794800802233696

9. Sergeyev Ya. D. Arithmetic of Infinity. Edizioni Orizzonti Meridionali, CS; 2003. 2nd electronic ed, 2013.

10. Tirosh D. Finite and infinite sets: definitions and intuitions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 1999;30(3):341–349. DOI: 10.1080/002073999287879

11. Nasr L. The effect of arithmetic of infinity methodology on students’ beliefs of infinity. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 2022;19:5–19. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361893086_The_Effect_of_Arithmetic_of_Infinity_Methodology_on_Students’_Beliefs_of_Infinity

12. Dubinsky E., McDonald M. A. APOS: A constructivist theory of learning in undergraduate mathematics education research. The Teaching and Learning of Mathematics at University Level. New ICMI Study Series. 2001;7:275–282. Springer, Dordrecht. DOI: 10.1007/0-306-47231-7_25

13. Sergeyev Ya. D. Methodology of numerical computations with infinities and infinitesimals. Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico dell’Università e Politecnico di Torino. 2010;68(2):95–113. Available at: http://www.seminariomatematico.polito.it/rendiconti/68-2/95.pdf

14. Sergeyev Ya. D. Numerical infinities and infinitesimals: Methodology, applications, and repercussions on two Hilbert problems. EMS Surveys in Mathematical Sciences. 2017;4(2):219–320. DOI: 10.4171/EMSS/4-2-3

15. Gordon P. Numerical cognition without words: Evidence from Amazonia. Science. 2004;306:496–499. DOI: 10.1126/science.1094492

16. Rizza D. The First steps in the arithmetic of infinity. A new way of counting and measuring. 2019. Retrieved from: http://www.numericalinfinities.com (last accessed: November, 2021)

17. Sergeyev Ya. D. A new look at infinitely large and infinitely small quantities: Methodological foundations and practical calculations with these numbers on a computer. Informatics and Education. 2021;36(8):5–22. (In Russian.) DOI: 10.32517/0234-0453-2021-36-8-5-22

18. Calude C. S., Dumitrescu M. Infinitesimal probabilities based on grossone. SN Computer Science. 2020;1(1):36. DOI: 10.1007/s42979-019-0042-8

19. D’Alotto L. Finite and infinite computations and a classification of two-dimensional cellular automata using infinite computations. In: Malyshkin, V. (eds) Parallel Computing Technologies. PaCT 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2017;10421:183–195. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-62932-2_17

20. D’Alotto L. Infinite games on finite graphs using grossone. Soft Computing. 2020;24(23):17509–17515. DOI: 10.1007/s00500-020-05167-1

21. De Leone R., Fasano G., Roma M., Sergeyev Ya. D. Iterative grossone-based computation of negative curvature directions in large-scale optimization. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications. 2020;186(2):554–589. DOI: 10.1007/s10957-020-01717-7

22. Fiaschi L., Cococcioni M. Numerical asymptotic results in Game Theory using Sergeyev’s Infinity Computing. arXiv preprint. 2018:1–28. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1808.00738

23. Iavernaro F., Mazzia F., Mukhametzhanov M. S., Sergeyev Ya. D. Computation of higher order Lie derivatives on the Infinity Computer. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics. 2021;383:1–19. DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2020.113135

24. Rizza D. A Study of Mathematical Determination through Bertrand’s Paradox. Philosophia Mathematica. 2018;26(3):375–395. DOI: 10.1093/philmat/nkx035

25. Sergeyev Ya. D., Mukhametzhanov M. S., Mazzia F., Iavernaro F., Amodio P. Numerical methods for solving initial value problems on the infinity computer. International Journal of Unconventional Computing. 2016;12(1):3–23. Available at: https://www.theinfinitycomputer.com/wpcontent/uploads/2020/11/ODEs_2.pdf

26. Sergeyev Ya. D. Numerical point of view on calculus for functions assuming finite, infinite, and infinitesimal values over finite, infinite, and infinitesimals domains. Nonlinear analysis: Theory, methods and applications. 2009;71(12):e1688-e1707. DOI: 10.1016/j.na.2009.02.030

27. Sergeyev Ya. D. The exact (up to infinitesimals) infinite perimeter to the Koch snowflake and its finite area. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation. 2016;31(1-3):21–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2015.07.004

28. Sergeyev Ya. D. Some paradoxes of infinity revisited. Mediterranean Journal of Mathematics. 2022;19(3):143. DOI: 10.1007/s00009-022-02063-w

29. Antoniotti L., Caldarola F. & Maiolo M. infinite numerical computing applied to Hilbert’s, Peano’s, and Moore’s Curves. Mediterranean Journal of Mathematics. 2020;17(3):99. DOI: 10.1007/s00009-020-01531-5

30. Caldarola F., Maiolo M., Solferino V. A new approach to the Z-transform through infinite computation. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation. 2020;82:105019. DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2019.105019

31. Margenstern M. Using grossone to count the number of elements of infinite sets and the connection with bijections. p-Adic Numbers, Ultrametric Analysis and Applications. 2011;3(3):196–204. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1106.2290

32. Lolli G. Metamathematical investigations on the theory of grossone. Applied Mathematics and Computation. 2015;255:3–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2014.03.140

33. Iannone P., Rizza D., Thoma A. Investigating secondary school students’ epistemologies through a class activity concerning infinity. Proc. 42th Conf. of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. 2018;3:131–138. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/2134/34064

34. Antoniotti L., Caldarola F., d’Atri G., Pellegrini M. New approaches to basic calculus: An experimentation via numerical computation. In: Sergeev Ya. D., Kvasov D. E. (eds) Numerical Computations: Theory and Algorithms. NUMTA 2019. Revised Selected Papers, Part I: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2020;11973:329–342. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-39081-5_29

35. Ingarozza F., Adamo M. T., Martino M., & Piscitelli A. A grossone-based numerical model for computations with infinity: A case study in an Italian high school. In: Sergeyev Ya. D., Kvasov D. E. (eds) Numerical Computations: Theory and Algorithms. NUMTA 2019. Revised Selected Papers, Part I: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2020;11973:451–462. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-39081-5_39

36. Mazzia F. A computational point of view on teaching derivatives. Informatics and Education. 2022;37(1):79–86. DOI: 10.32517/0234-0453-2022-37-1-79-86

37. Singer F. M., Voica C. Perception of infinity: Does it really help in problem solving? The Mathematics Education into the 21st Century Project. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of The Decidable and the Undecidable in Mathematics Education. Brno, Czech Republic; 2003.

38. Dubinsky E., Arnon I., Weller K. Preservice teachers’ understanding of the relation between a fraction or integer and its decimal expansion: The case of 0.9 - and 1. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education. 2013;13(3):232–258. DOI: 10.1080/14926156.2013.816389

39. Nasr L., Haifa N. Conceptions of Infinity: An APOS Analysis. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology. 2018;3(12):193–197. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353164475_Conceptions_of_Infinity_An_APOS_Analysis


Review

For citations:


Nasr L. Students’ resolutions of some paradoxes of infinity in the lens of the grossone methodology. Informatics and education. 2023;38(1):83-91. https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2023-38-1-83-91

Views: 324


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0234-0453 (Print)
ISSN 2658-7769 (Online)