Interactive technologies of practical literacy in the digital educational mainstream structure
https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2022-37-5-44-52
Abstract
The article is made in line with the new educational paradigm, replacing the installation of “ready knowledge” with the installation of independent “production of knowledge”, i. e., to “learn to learn”.
Digitalization of education has qualitatively changed the content of education, making it informational, and the organization of educational and cognitive activities more effective. This process manifests itself as creativity. The results of the work of teachers, methodologists and scientists are a universal means of education and the subject of training. Continuing education involves the development and expansion of subject learning and the components of its methodological system through interaction with other components of the information and educational environment. This, in turn, requires the search for new organizational forms and means of implementing such educational activities in a modern information and communication environment, which will make it possible to use the didactic capabilities of this environment to a much greater extent.
It is noted that the communicative aspect and communication processes, tools and technologies should contribute to the organization of effective dialogue (communication), the perception and assimilation of communicative competencies by students, overcoming illiterate use of the Russian language in cyberspace. As practice shows, the latter has become a real philological disaster. The language of virtual communication is not equal to the language of real communication.
The article notes that one of the promising directions in the conditions of digital transformation of education is interactive learning as a special form of organization of cognitive activity and a way of cognition carried out in the process of joint educational and cognitive activity of students, in which all participants interact with each other and exchange information.
Digital technologies can be used in teaching Russian at all levels of education. At the same time, the teacher can create educational materials with their own digital interactive content based on the proposed HTML environment programs. On the website “The Power of Knowledge” (EOR “Alphabet”) and on the portal of KubGU (section “Innovative computer didactics”), you can see several examples of such training. The authors believe that the process of digital technologies’ dominance in all spheres of public activity (digital mainstream) should lead to an increase in the general level of practical literacy in the Russian language among the entire population of the country.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. I. ArkhipovaRussian Federation
Alevtina I. Arkhipova, Doctor of Sciences (Education), Professor, Professor at the Department of Information Educational Technologies
Krasnodar
V. A. Ivanov
Russian Federation
Viktor А. Ivanov, Candidate of Sciences (Education), Associate Professor at the Department of Optoelectronics
Krasnodar
A. G. Prigodina
Russian Federation
Anna G. Prigodina, Candidate of Sciences (Education), Associate Professor at the Department of Applied Mathematics
Krasnodar
References
1. Arkhipova A. I., Grushevsky S. P., Pichkurenko E. A., Shmalko S. P., Sevryugina N. I. Hermeneutical approach to the design process interactive learning environment technologies. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. Ser. DLT 2020 — Selected Papers of the 5th International Scientific and Practical Conference “Distance Learning Technologies”. 2021;(2914):25–37. Available at : https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2914/paper3.pdf
2. Arkhipova A. I., Grushevsky S. P., Ivanov V. A., Sevryugina N. I., Shmalko S. P., Pichkurenko E. A. Interactive computer technologies to support and develop reading in primary school children. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. Ser. DLT 2020 — Selected Papers of the 5th International Scientific and Practical Conference “Distance Learning Technologies”. 2021;(2914):38–47. Available at: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2914/paper4.pdf
3. Zasyadko O. V., Kosyarsky A. A., Shmalko S. P. Visualization in the study of the simplest equations of mathematical physics. Educational Technologies. 2019;(1):103–109. (In Russian.) Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=40380704]
4. Emtseva S. B., Gavrilenko E. N., Shmalko S. P. Development of projects for personalized professional trajectory of students in the conditions of a general educational school — a new demand of a new reality. School Technologies. 2021;(1):19–28. (In Russian.) Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=45735264]
5. Ozhegov S. I., Shvedova N. Y. Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language: 72500 words and 7500 phraseological expressions. Moscow, Az; 1992. 955 p. (In Russian.)]
6. Dobrovolskaya N. Y., Garkusha O. V. Research of the readiness of computer science teachers to study visual programming in the framework of additional education. Scientific Support of a System of Advanced Training. 2022;1(50):115–125. (In Russian.) Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48064215]
7. Kolin K. K. Education for the future. Methodology and methods of informatization of education: Concepts, programs, technologies. Materials of the all-russian scientific and practical conference. Smolensk, SSPU; 2004:3–19. (In Russian.) Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35355454]
8. Bogin G. I. Gaining the ability to understand: An introduction to philological hermeneutics. Tver; 2001. 731 p. (In Russian.) Available at: https://studfile.net/preview/7439420/]
9. Закирова А. Ф. Теоретические основы педагогической герменевтики. Тюмень: Тюменский государственный университет; 2011. 152 с. Режим доступа: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20223841 [Zakirova A. F. Theoretical fundamentals of pedagogical hermeneutics. Tyumen, University of Tyumen; 2001. 152 p. (In Russian.) Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20223841]
10. Gadamer H.-G. Truth and method: Fundamentals of philosophical hermeneutics: Trans. from german. Moscow, Progress; 1988. 704 p. (In Russian.) Available at: https://sci.house/filosofiya-fundamentalnaya-scibook/istina-metodosnovyi-filos-germenevtiki-per.html]
11. Bloom B. S. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals: Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, Longmans; 1956. 207 p. Available at: https://www.ifeet.org/files/-Benjamin_S._Bloom-_Taxonomy_of_Educational_Object.pdf
12. Bershadskaya E. A., Bershadskij M. E. Cognitive technologies in education. Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University named after M. K. Ammosov. Pedagogics. Psychology. Philosophy. 2016;3(03):5–11. (In Russian.) Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26696340]
13. Arzamastseva N. V. Trends in the development of the future education system and the problems caused by it. Psychological and pedagogical research in the education system: I All-Russian scientific and practical conference. Moscow; Chelyabinsk, Education; 2003:231–237. (In Russian.) Available at: https://rusist.info/book/472746
14. Beglaryan M. E., Vashchekin A. N., Kvachko V. Yu., Pichkurenko E. A. Mathematics.Volume 1. Textbook. Moscow, RSUJ; 2015. 184 p. (In Russian.) Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27908413]
15. Grushevskii S. P., Kharchenko A.V. Ways of forming the ability to design educational materials on computer science. Current problems of teaching mathematics and informatics at school and university. Proceedings of the V International Correspondence Scientific Conference. Under the general editorship of L. I. Bozhenkova, M. V. Egupova. Moscow, Moscow Pedagogical State University; 2020:270–276. (In Russian.) Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43970983]
16. Nazarova O. V., Nazarov A.V. About the benefits of free software in e-learning. Pedagogical Informatics. 2020;(3):34– 47. (In Russian.) Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44091751]
17. Lazarev V. A. About some conclusions and problems in working with gifted students. Continuum. Maths. Informatics. Education. 2020;(1(17)):24–28. (In Russian.) DOI: 10.24888/2500-1957-2020-17-1-24-28]
18. Malevinsky S. O. Russian nouns expressing the meaning of the uncertainty of the referent. Continuality and discreteness in language and speech. Materials of the VIII All-Russian Scientific Conference. Krasnodar, Kuban State University; 2021:27–30. (In Russian.) Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=47308000]
19. Malevinsky S. O. Russian nouns expressing the meaning of the uncertainty of the referent. Meaning as a Phenomenon of the Current Linguistic Consciousness of Native Speaker: Collection of scientific articles. Voronezh, Rhythm; 2021:77–84. (In Russian.) Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=47499851&pff=1
20. Pichkurenko E. A., Kolesnik L. M., Kolesnik L. M. Scientific and methodological approaches to the analysis of pedagogical experience. Modern specialist and professional competencies: Methodological Aspect of Training: Proceedings of the conference. Krasnodar, Kuban Socio-Economic Institute; 2016:84–90. (In Russian.) Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27645647]
21. Sitnikova M. I. Principles of constructing the concept of forming a culture of professional and pedagogical selfrealization of a university teacher. Belgorod State University Scientific bulletin. Humanities. Philology. Journalism. Pedagogy. Psychology. 2010;(6(77)):92–100. (In Russian.) Available at: www.bsuedu.ru/upload/iblock/c81/6_77_%205+.pdf]
Review
For citations:
Arkhipova A.I., Ivanov V.A., Prigodina A.G. Interactive technologies of practical literacy in the digital educational mainstream structure. Informatics and education. 2022;37(5):44-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2022-37-5-44-52