Preview

Informatics and education

Advanced search

Pedagogical conditions enabling the finalists of the Artificial Intelligence Olympiad to achieve great results

https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2022-37-1-69-78

Abstract

The article analyses the survey of the finalists in the first All-Russian Artificial Intelligence Olympiad for school students of the 8–11 grades of general education institutions. Artificial Intelligence is a strategically important area; it is designated as one of the end-to-end digital technologies in the national program “The Digital Economy of the Russian Federation”. Such technologies ensure accelerated development of priority sectors of the economy and the social sphere. In 2021 within the framework of achieving result 1.7 of the Federal Project “Artificial Intelligence” of the National Program “The Digital Economy of the Russian Federation’, the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation organized and held an Artificial Intelligence Olympiad for school students of the 8–11 grades of general education institutions. The following objectives were pursued during the research: to obtain the Olympiad finalists’ “portrait” focusing on certain characteristic features; to examine the finalists’ attitude to the concept of “artificial intelligence”; to identify the pedagogical conditions enabling the finalists to succeed in the Olympiad; to provide an update on several modern trends in the development of general education. The systematization of the winners’ answers made it possible to develop an algorithm for achieving success that guaranteed the finalists the excellent results in the Artificial Intelligence Olympiad. This algorithm serves as a pedagogical condition for updating modern trends in general education. The implementation of correctly chosen pedagogical conditions can ensure the development and efficiency of the pedagogical system to achieve good results in the Artificial Intelligence Olympiad.

About the Author

I. I. Trubina
Institute for Strategy of Education Development of the Russian Academy of Education
Russian Federation

Irina I. Trubina - Doctor of Sciences (Education), Professor, Leading Research Fellow.

Moscow



References

1. Ippolitova N., Sterhova N. Analysis of the notion “pedagogical conditions”: essence and classification. General and Professional Education. 2012;1:8–14. (In Russian.) Available at: http://ru.genproedu.com/paper/2012-01/008-014.pdf

2. Chelnokova Ye. A., Tyumaseva Z. I. Evolution of the mentoring system in pedagogical practice. Minin University Bulletin. 2018;6 (4);1–11. (In Russian.) DOI: 10.26795/23071281-2018-6-4-11

3. Analysis of the world’s best mentoring practices. National Mentoring Resource Center Mentori. (In Russian.) Available at: https://center-prof38.ru/sites/default/files/one_click/analiz_luchshih_mirovyh_praktik_nastavnichestva_pdf?ysclid=l141tdx5bp

4. Gorobets L. N., Dokshina N. V. Peculiarities of the metasubject approach in distance learning conditions. Modern technologies in teaching the Russian language. Collection of materials of the international scientific-and-practical conference, dedicated to the 60th anniversary of the Department of Methodology. Moscow: Moscow Pedagogical State University; 2020:54–58. (In Russian.) Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_44417365_39573495.pdf

5. Krayevsky V. V., Berezhnova Ye. V. Methodology of pedagogy: A new phase. Textbook for students of higher educational institutions. Moscow: Academiya; 2006. 400 p. (In Russian.)

6. Mudrik A. V. Social Pedagogy. Textbook for students of pedagogical universities. Еdited by V. A. Slastenin. Moscow: Academiya; 2005. 200 p. (In Russian.)

7. Litvak R. A., Bondarchuk T. V. Patterns of socialization of gifted children in modern socio-cultural conditions. Modern Studies of Social Problems. Electronic Scientific Journal. 2012;1;635–644. (In Russian.) Available at: http://www.spsl.nsc.ru/FullText/konfe_1-2012.pdf

8. Hofstadter D., Dennett D. The Mind’s I: Fantasies And Reflections On Self & Soul. New York: Basic Books, 1981. 512 p.

9. Rezayev A. V., Tregubova N. D. Artificial intelligence, online culture, artificial sociality: Definition of concepts. Public Opinion Monitoring: Economic and Social Changes. 2019;6(154):35–47. (In Russian.) DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2019.6.03

10. Chistyakova S. N. Pedagogical support of students’ selfdetermination: Teacher Guide. Moscow: Academiya; 2007. 122 p. (In Russian.)

11. Belkin A. S. The success situation. Ways to create it. Teacher’s Guide. Moscow: Prosvescheniye; 1991. 168 p. (In Russian.)

12. Levchenko I. V., Merenkova P. A. Formation of meaningful modules for learning artificial intelligence in middle school. Bulletin of the People’s Friendship University of Russia. Series: Informatization of Education. 2021;18(3):227– 237. (In Russian.) DOI: 10.22363/2312-8631-2021-18-3-227-237]

13. Volodin A. A., Bondarenko N. G. Analyzing the content of the «organizational-and-pedagogical conditions» concept. Proceedings of Tula State University. Humanities. 2014;(2):143–152. (In Russian.) Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=34030478

14. Repeta L. M. Pedagogical conditions for the formation of information and research competence. Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2013;2:1–8. (In Russian.) Available at: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=8583

15. Polonsky V. M. Dictionary of Education and Pedagogy. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola; 2004. 512 p. (In Russian.)

16. Polat Ye. S. et al. Theory and practice of distance learning: a textbook for universities. Moscow: Uwrite. 2020. 434 p. (In Russian.)

17. Yelshansky S. P. School of the future: Can artificial intelligence provide cognitive effectiveness of learning? Bulletin of Tomsk State University. 2021; 462: 192–201. (In Russian.) DOI: 10.17223/15617793/462/23

18. Gureyeva L. V. Connectivism Learning Theory. Young Scientist. 2014;6(65):695–697. (In Russian.) Available at: https://moluch.ru/archive/65/10617/]

19. Tagunova I. A. Global trends in the development of school education. Pedagogy. 2019;(6):106–114. (In Russian.)

20. Gutorova G. D. Meta-subject competencies and assessment of the level of their formation among middle school students. Philology and Culture. 2021;64(2):239–245. (In Russian.) DOI: 10.26907/2074-0239-2021-64-2-239-245]

21. Obukhov A. S. Development of students’ research activities. Moscow: National Book Center; 2015. 280 p. (In Russian.) Available at: https://www.nbcmedia.ru/upload/iblock/fa4/obuhov_verstka.pdf

22. Leontovich A. V. Modeling students’ research activities: Practical aspects. School Technologies. 2006;(6):89–98. (In Russian.)


Review

For citations:


Trubina I.I. Pedagogical conditions enabling the finalists of the Artificial Intelligence Olympiad to achieve great results. Informatics and education. 2022;37(1):69-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2022-37-1-69-78

Views: 300


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0234-0453 (Print)
ISSN 2658-7769 (Online)