LMS Moodle interactive modules in student motivation management
https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2022-37-1-49-58
Abstract
The article describes the experience of using the LMS Moodle interactive “Seminar” module to activate students’ independent activities, based on the example of teaching chemical disciplines. Special focus is placed upon student motivation to participate in discussion projects related to the role of chemical processes in their future professional activities. In the context of this type of activities, the students were asked to write a paper on one of the suggested topics in compliance with previously specified criteria. They were also asked to make a critical assessment of other students’ papers on the selected seminar topic. The article reviews the reports on various types of students’ activities and reviews the quality of the online course and e-learning system based on student feedback. For a numerical assessment of the quality of teaching and learning materials, it is proposed to use systems of equations of fuzzy sets. The technologies described in the article expand the set of criteria to assess the students’ proficiency and promote emergence effect.
About the Authors
O. V. AndryushkovaRussian Federation
Olga V. Andryushkova - Candidate of Sciences (Chemistry), Docent, Head of the Laboratory of Methods of Teaching Chemistry of the Department of General Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry.
Moscow
M. A. Kareva
Russian Federation
Maria A. Kareva - Candidate of Sciences (Chemistry), Senior Lecturer at the Department of General Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry.
Moscow
L. A. Fishgoit
Russian Federation
Larisa A. Fishgoit - Candidate of Sciences (Chemistry), Senior Research Fellow at the Department of General Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry.
Moscow
E. V. Marushina
Russian Federation
Elena V. Marushina - Candidate of Sciences (Chemistry), Junior Research Fellow at the Department of General Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry.
Moscow
References
1. Tarasova N. A. Interactivity and methods of interactive interaction between subjects of the learning process. Questions of Pedagogy. 2021;(5-2):313–316. (In Russian.) Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_45841641_33028390.pdf
2. Krivykh N. I., Krivykh L. D., Bagrintseva O. B. Modern educational technologies: interactivity as a principle of efficiency. Pedagogical Research. 2020;(2):5–11. (In Russian.) Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_44438977_69213235.pdf
3. Savinykh G. P. Unciphered motivation: will online education cope with human nature and what will happen to the assessment? Interactive Education. 2020;(2):9–11. (In Russian.) Available at: https://interactiv.su/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/IO_20_2-blok.pdf?ysclid=l1brrgutmr
4. Karmanova E. V. The features of organizing blended learning using LMS Moodle. Informatics and Education. 2018;33(8):43–50. (In Russian.) DOI: 10.32517/0234-0453-2018-33-8-43-50
5. Dozhdikov A. V. Online learning as e-learning: Quality and results (critical analysis). Higher Education in Russia. 2020;(12):21–32. (In Russian.) DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-12-21-32
6. Cerezo R., Bogarín A., Esteban M., Romero C. Process mining for self-regulated learning assessment in e-learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. 2020;32(1):74– 88. DOI:10.1007/S12528-019-09225-Y
7. Platonov V. N.’s Facebook community “Online course quality”. (In Russian.) Available at: https://www.facebook.com/groups/730339183723259/
8. Novikova N. M., Ananchenkova P. I. Education in a new social reality: COVID-19 lessons. Труд и социальные отношения. 2020;(4):57–64. DOI: 10.20410/2073-78152020-30-4-57-64
9. Novikova N. M., Ananchenkova P. I. Education in a new social reality: COVID-19 lessons. Labor and Social Relations Journal. 2020;(4):57–64. DOI: 10.20410/2073-7815-202030-4-57-64
10. Salikhov S. V. Assessment of the quality of a distance learning course on information technologies for a professional development system. (In Russian.) Available at: http://www.km.ru/referats/335086-otsenka-kachestva-distantsionnogokursa-po-informatsionnym-tekhnologiyam-dlya-sistemypovyshe
11. Andreev A. A. The quality of online learning. E-learning in Continuing Education. 2017;(1):340–345. (In Russian.) Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_29120692_91069161.pdf
12. Andryushkova O. V., Grigoriev S. G. Methodology for assessment of the quality of learning based on negentropy. Informatics and Education, 2019;34(10):37–45. (In Russian.) DOI: 10.32517/0234-0453-2019-34-10-37-45
13. Andryushkova O., Grigoriev S. The influence online learning quality criteria selectionon negentropy. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. 2020;2770:127–139. Available at: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2770/paper17.pdf
14. Ishikawa K. Japanese methods of quality management. Moscow: Economics; 1988. 199 p. (In Russian.)
15. Ryabikova N. E., Kutsenko E. I. Abstract as a type of work with information in a personality-oriented approach to learning. World Science. 2019; 3(24):233–237. (In Russian.) Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_38081841_85207955.pdf
16. Volkov E. N. Critical thinking: Bibliography. (In Russian.) Available at: http://evolkov.net/critic.think/bibliography/bibliogr.crit.think.html
17. Li Z., Wu W., He Y., Du C. W. Comparison of microbiologically influenced corrosion of structural steel by nitrate-reducing bacteria in aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Construction and Building Materials. 2021;288(3):1–12. DOI:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123091
18. Delpupo M. N., Inés G., Candia C., Asmus G., Mansilla A. Relationship between the electrogalvanized stages and the income of hydrogen in a low carbon wire steel. Procedia Materials Science 9. 2015:171–176. DOI: 10.1016/j.mspro.2015.04.022
19. Shojaei E., Mirjalili M., Moayed M.H. The influence of the crevice induced IR drop on polarization measurement oflocalized corrosion behavior of 316L stainless steel. Corrosion Science. 2019;156:96–105. DOI:10.1016/J.CORSCI.2019.04.030
20. Kumaraguru S., Gnanamuthu RM. An efficient corrosion protection activity of electrodeposited Ni/Ni-Co-Mn oxide composite for surface modification of steel. Materials Letters. 2021;295. DOI:10.1016/j.matlet.2021.129804
21. Fan Y., Liu W., Sun Z., Chowwanonthapunya Th., Zhao Y., Dong B., Zhang T., Banthukul W. Effect of chloride ion on corrosion resistance of Ni-advanced weatheringsteel in simulated tropical marine atmosphere. Construction and Building Materials. 2021;266. DOI:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120937
Review
For citations:
Andryushkova O.V., Kareva M.A., Fishgoit L.A., Marushina E.V. LMS Moodle interactive modules in student motivation management. Informatics and education. 2022;37(1):49-58. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2022-37-1-49-58