Preview

Informatics and education

Advanced search

Methodology for the implementation and use of text reuse detection systems in secondary education

https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2021-36-10-5-14

Abstract

The article analyses the situation with the lack of systematic control over the originality of texts of students’ written works in secondary schools, including individual projects, provided by the Russian Federal State Educational Standards. The authors point out that compliance with the academic program’s requirements to observe the norms and rules of citation and absence of plagiarism in the texts of individual projects is not ensured in practice in any way. In particular, schools have not developed evaluation criteria and procedures for monitoring. Also, there is no access to the necessary text reuse detection tools. The article substantiates the necessity for secondary education to check students’ for reused text by using specialized software on the example of the “Antiplagiat” system. As a result of the study, a methodology of introducing digital tools for text reuse detection in schools is presented. We developed such a methodology for secondary schools for the first time. It will allow avoiding the repetition of methodological errors made during the introduction of tools for text reuse detection in higher education, provide methodological support to teachers, and establish adequate criteria for assessing the originality of works, considering the specifics of the school.

About the Authors

Yu. V. Chekhovich
The Federal Research Centre “Computer Science and Control” of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Antiplagiat Company
Russian Federation

Yury V. Chekhovich, Candidate of Sciences (Physics and Mathematics), Head of the Department; Chief Executive Officer 

Moscow



O. S. Belenkaya
Antiplagiat Company
Russian Federation

Olga S. Belenkaya, Head of the Educational and Methodological
Centre

Moscow



References

1. Nikitov A. V., Orchakov O. A., Chekhovich Yu. V. Plagiarism in works of undergraduate and graduate students: problem and methods of counteraction. University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2012;(5):61–68. Available at: https://www.umj.ru/jour/article/view/506

2. Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated June 29, 2015 No. 636 (as amended on March 27, 2020) “On approval of the Procedure for conducting state final certification for educational programmes of higher education — bachelor’s programmes, specialist programmes and master’s programmes”. Available at: https://base.garant.ru/71145690/

3. Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia No. 227 of March 18, 2016 (as revised on March 27, 2020) “On approval of the Procedure for conducting the state final attestation under higher education programmes of scientific and pedagogical training in postgraduate (adjunct) studies, residency programmes, assistantship and internship programmes”. Available at: https://base.garant.ru/71375360/

4. Vakurova O. A., Filippova O. A. Formation and assessment of skills of independent preparation of written works in general education. Open education. 2021;25(3):4–14. DOI: 10.21686/1818-4243-2021-3-4-14

5. Belenkaya O. S., Suvorova M. A., Filippova O. A., Chekhovich Yu. V. Tasks of text reuse detection systems when applied to the text reuse detection in secondary school written works. Intelligent Data Processing: Theory and Applications: Book of abstract of the 13th Int. Con. (Moscow, 2020). Moscow, Russian Academy of Sciences, 2020:239–243. Available at: http://www.machinelearning.ru/wiki/images/3/31/Idp20.pdf

6. Bolkunov I. A. Ways to overcome student plagiarism. Problems of modern pedagogical education. Series: Pedagogy and Psychology. Yalta; 2009:58–66. Available at: http://science.cfuv.ru/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/17.pdf

7. Il’ina O. K. Students’ written creative works (unintentional plagiarism). Linguistics & Polyglot Studies. 2008;(33):131–135. Available at: https://mgimo.ru/library/publications/73840/

8. Baryshev R. A. Development of service of searching borrowings in the text into the private office of a reader of the SFU scientific library. Informatics and Education. 2017;32(2):43–45. Available at: https://info.infojournal.ru/jour/article/view/145

9. Ma H. J., Wan G., Lu E. Y. Digital cheating and plagiarism in schools. Theory Into Practice. 2008;47(3):197–203. DOI: 10.1080/00405840802153809

10. Samuel Kai Wah Chu, Xuanxi Li, Sanny Mok. UPCC: A model of plagiarism-free inquiry project-based learning. Library & Information Science Research. 2021;43(1):101073. DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2021.101073

11. Baysen E., Hošková-Mayerová Š., Çakmak N., Baysen F. Misconceptions regarding providing citations: To neglect means to take risk for future scientific research. In: Hošková-Mayerová Š., Maturo F., Kacprzyk J. (eds) Mathematical-Statistical Models and Qualitative Theories for Economic and Social Sciences. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control. 2017;104:177–186. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-54819-7_12

12. Torres Diaz J. C., Duart J. M., Torres Carrión P. V., Marín Gutierrez I. Plagiarism and use of technology by high school students. Campus Virtuales. 2021;10(2):175–184. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353635031_Plagiarism_and_use_of_technology_by_high_school_students

13. Sureda-Negre J., Comas-Forgas R., Oliver-Trobat M. Academic plagiarism among secondary and high school students: Differences in gender and procrastination [Plagio académico entre alumnado de Secundaria y Bachillerato: Diferencias en cuanto al género y la procrastinación]. Comunicar. 2015;44:103–111. DOI: 10.3916/C44-2015-11

14. Letter of Rosobrnadzor dated 09.24.2020 No. 05-86 “On sending of methodological documents and materials in order for the organization and conducting the final essay (presentation) in the 2020/2021 academic year”. Available at: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/565889585

15. Letter of Rosobrnadzor dated 10/17/2016 No. 10-764 “On sending of updated editions versions of methodological documents recommended for use in the organization and conducting the final essay (presentation) in the 2016/17 academic year”. Appendix 6. Available at: https://rulaws.ru/acts/Pismo-Rosobrnadzora-ot-17.10.2016-N-10-764/

16. Order of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation dated May 31, 2021 No. 287 “On approval of the Federal State Educational Standard for Basic General Education”. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_389560/

17. Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia No. 413 of 05/17/2012 (as amended on 12/11/2020) “On approval of the Federal State Educational Standard for Secondary General Education”. Available at: https://base.garant.ru/70188902/

18. Approximate Basic Educational Programme of Basic General Education (approved by the decision of the Federal Educational and Methodological Association for General Education, minutes of 08/04/2015 No. 1/15) (revised from 04/02/2020). Available at: https://goo.su/9EEc

19. Lukyanova L. A. Readiness of teachers to organize pupils’ research activity. I. Yakovlev Chuvash State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2016;(1):122–131. Available at: http://vestnik.chgpu.edu.ru/?do=archive&vid=2&nom=500

20. School No. 1272. Regulations on an individual project. Available at: https://sch1272.mskobr.ru/info_edu/all_docs/

21. School No. 1793. Regulations on an individual project. Available at: https://lyc1793uv.mskobr.ru/info_edu/all_docs/

22. Regulations on the individual final project of the State budgetary educational institution Lyceum No. 387 named after N. V. Belousov of the Kirovsky district of St. Petersburg. Available at: http://www.kirov.spb.ru/sc/387/docs/polozenie_ip.pdf/

23. School No. 1 “Educational Centre” named after Hero of the Soviet Union P. M. Ganyushin of Sergievsk, Sergievskiy municipal district, Samara Region. Regulations on the individual final project of students at the level of secondary general education. Available at: http://sergievsk1.minobr63.ru/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/18_Polozhenie-IP_podpisano.pdf

24. Frumin I. D., Dobryakova M. S. What makes Russian universities change: Disengagement compact. Educational Studies. 2012;(2):159–191. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2012-2-159-191

25. Federal Law No. 273-FZ “On Education in the Russian Federation” dated December 29, 2012. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_140174/

26. Approximate Basic Educational Programme for Secondary General Education (approved by the decision of the Federal Educational and Methodological Association for General Education, minutes of June 28, 2016 No. 2/16-z). Available at: https://fgosreestr.ru/registry/primernaya-osnovnaya-obrazovatelnaya-programma-srednego-obshhego-obrazovaniya/

27. Loginov D. A. An approximate programme of the metasubject course “Individual project” for educational organizations that implement programmes for secondary general education. Saratov; 2018. 20 p.

28. The programme of the regional component of the basic curriculum of the modular course for the basic school “Fundamentals of project activities”. O. V. Churakova (ed). Samara, Profi; 2003. 132 p.

29. Amelin R. V., Channov S. E. Some problems of using automated information systems in education. Informatics and Education. 2016;31(1):50–54. Available at: https://info.infojournal.ru/jour/article/view/11

30. Chekhovich Yu. V. How to find Lenin Square, or Reflections on the practice of Order No. 636, the percentage of originality, incorrect and improper text resue and Goodhart’s law. University Book. 2018;(2):72–73.


Review

For citations:


Chekhovich Yu.V., Belenkaya O.S. Methodology for the implementation and use of text reuse detection systems in secondary education. Informatics and education. 2021;(10):5-14. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2021-36-10-5-14

Views: 1005


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0234-0453 (Print)
ISSN 2658-7769 (Online)