Sistema otsenivaniya kompetentsii komandnoj raboty budushhikh spetsialistov IT-sfery [The system for assessing the teamwork competency of future IT specialists]
https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2020-35-9-20-27
Abstract
The article highlights the need to prepare future IT specialists for teamwork. The system for assessing the teamwork competency is proposed. The system includes a set of indicators, which are divided into invariant and variable. Each indicator is characterized by a grading scale with three possible assessment options: “not mastered” — 0, “partially mastered” — 1, “mastered” — 2. In the context of “indicator — assessment”, the required standard of student behavior in the process of performing team activities was determined. Invariant indicators are used to assess the teamwork competency, regardless of the role played by the student. The invariant indicators are indicated: understanding the importance of the task for the team's activities, the distribution of roles in the team, team interaction, the assessment of the teamwork. To determine the variable indicators, an analysis of the existing methods for the distribution ofcommand roles was carried out, the types of activities of an IT specialist were studied. To solve problems related to the implementation of activities for the design, development and maintenance of software tools within the framework of teamwork, it is advisable to distinguish six roles: analyst, innovator, negotiator, designer, executor, coordinator. Based on these roles, variable indicators are defined. The division of indicators into invariant and variable implies different requirements for the level of development. Invariant indicators must be mastered by all, while variable indicators allow for partial mastering in some indicators. The use of the system for assessing the teamwork competency will reveal potential problems in the preparation of a future IT specialist, clearly define the directions of the student's development, and form recommendations for him regarding professional activities.
About the Authors
E. S. VasevaRussian Federation
Elena S. Vaseva - Candidate of Sciences (Education), Associate Professor at the Information Technology Department.
622031, Nizhny Tagil, ul. Krasnogvardeyskaya, 57
N. V. Buzhinskaya
Russian Federation
Nadezhda V. Buzhinskaya, Candidate of Sciences (Education), Docent, Associate Professor at the Information Technology Department.
622031, Nizhny Tagil, ul. Krasnogvardeyskaya, 57
References
1. Olekhnovich M. O. Adaptatsiya novogo sotrudnika. Zapiska dlya prepodavatelya uchebnogo videokejsa [Adaptation of a new employee. Note for the teacher of the educational video case]. Saint Petersburg, Reshenie: uchebnoe video, 2012. 30 p. (In Russian.)
2. Prikaz Ministerstva obrazovaniya i nauki Rossijskoj Federatsii ot 19 sentyabrya 2017 goda № 922 “Ob utverzhdenii federal’nogo gosudarstvennogo obrazovatel’nogo standarta vys-shego obrazovaniya — bakalavriat po napravleniyu podgotovki 09.03.03 Prikladnaya informatika” [Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation dated September 19, 2017 No. 922 “On approval of the Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Education — a bachelor’s degree in training 09.03.03 Applied Informatics”]. (In Russian.) Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_280602/
3. Khutorskoy A. V. Metodologicheskie osnovaniya primeneniya kompetentnostnogo podkhoda k proektirovaniyu obrazovaniya [Methodological foundations for applying the competence approach to designing education]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii — Higher Education in Russia, 2017, no. 12, p. 85-91. (In Russian.) Available at: https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1228
4. Kharitonova E. V. Ob opredelenii ponyatij “kompetent-nost’” i “kompetentsiya” [About the definition of the notions “expertise” and “competence”]. Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya — Advances in Current Natural Sciences, 2007, no. 3, p. 67-68. (In Russian.) Available at: http://www.natural-sciences.ru/en/article/view?id=10999
5. Ozerkova I. A. Klassifikatsiya klyuchevykh kompe-tentsij kak uslovie ikh formirovaniya [Classification of key competencies as a condition for their formation]. Vestnik Instituta obrazovaniya cheloveka — Bulletin of the Institute of Human Education, 2014, no. 1, p. 17. (In Russian.) Available at: https://eidos-institute.ru/journal/2014/100/Eidos-Vestnik2014-117-Ozerkova.pdf
6. Voronov S. A. Kompetentsiya i kompetentnost’ kak kategorii deyatel’nosti: skhodstva i razlichiya v ponimanii [Theoretical analysis of similarities and differences in understanding of competence and competency]. Istoricheskaya i sotsial’noobrazovatel’naya mysl’— Historical and Social-Educational Idea, 2017, vol. 9, no. 6-1, p. 165-172. (In Russian.) DOI: 10.17748/2075-9908-2017-9-6/1-165-172
7. Glossarij WorldSkills Russia [Glossary WorldSkills Russia]. (In Russian.) Available at: https://rgtc.ru/worldskills/glossariy_v1.pdf
8. Nikishina V. B., Kuznetsova A. A., Prirodova O. F. Kompetentnostnaya model’ povysheniya kvalifikatsii prepodavatelya meditsinskogo vuza [Competency model for improvement medical university teacher’’s qualification]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii — Higher Education in Russia, 2018, vol. 27, no. 2, p. 19-27. (In Russian.) Available at: https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1269
9. Zeer E. F. Kompetentnostnyj podkhod k obrazovaniyu [Competence approach to education]. Obrazovanie i nauka. Izvestiya URO RAO — Education and Science. Izvestia URO RAO. 2005, no. 3, p. 27-40. (In Russian.)
10. Kagakina E. A., Slautina N. M., Utin E. V. Formiro-vanie professional’noj kompetentnosti studentov v siste-me vuzovskogo obrazovaniya [Formation of professional competence of students in the system of higher education]. Kemerovo, KSIC, 2006. 75 p. (In Russian.)
11. Radionova N. F., Tryapitsyna A. P. Kompetentnostnyj podkhod v pedagogicheskom obrazovanii [Competence approach in teacher education]. Vestnik Omskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta — Bulletin of the Omsk State Pedagogical University, 2006, no. 1. (In Russian.) Available at: http://www.omsk.edu/article/vestnik-omgpu-75.pdf
12. Trunova I. V., Emelina L. A. Kak otsenit’ kompetentsii [How to assess competencies]. Akkreditatsiya v obrazovanii — Accreditation in Education. 2013, no. 3, p. 82-83. (In Russian.) Available at: https://akvobr.ru/ocenit_kompetencii.html
13. Raven J. Competence in modern society. NYC, Royal Fireworks Publishing, 1997. 268 p.
14. Amelina Yu. V. Organizatsiya distantsionnoj ko-mandnoj raboty studentov IT-napravlenij [Organization of distance command work of IT students]. Informatika i obrazovanie — Informatics and Education, 2018, no. 4, p.42-45. (In Russian.)
15. Hawkins P., Shohet R. Supervision in the helping professions: Individual, group and organizational approach. London, Open University Press, 2000. 192 p.
16. Belbin R. M. Management Teams: Why they succeed or fail. London, Taylor & Francis, 2010. 204 p.
17. Margerison C. J. Team leadership: A guide to success with team management systems. Boston, Cengage Learning EMEA, 2002. 208 p.
18. Bazarov T. Yu., Eremin B. L. Upravlenie personalom [Personnel management]. Moscow, YUNITI, 2002. 560 p. (In Russian.)
19. GOST 34.601-90 Informatsionnaya tekhnologiya (IT). Kompleks standartov na avtomatizirovannye sistemy. Avtomatizirovannye sistemy. Stadii sozdaniya [GOST 34.601-90 Information technology (IT). Set of standards for automated systems. Automated systems. Stages of creation]. (In Russian.) Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200006921
Review
For citations:
Vaseva E.S., Buzhinskaya N.V. Sistema otsenivaniya kompetentsii komandnoj raboty budushhikh spetsialistov IT-sfery [The system for assessing the teamwork competency of future IT specialists]. Informatics and education. 2020;(9):20-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2020-35-9-20-27