BLOOM'S DIGITAL TAXONOMY AND MODEL OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF EDUCATION IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS OF UNIVERSITY
https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2019-34-6-42-48
Abstract
The article describes the integration of digital technologies in the educational process by SAMR model (Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, Redefinition) developed by Ruben Puentedura. The stages of the use of digital technologies in the educational process are considered. The application of these technologies to improve learning is justified. The examples are given that demonstrate the stage of routine use of digital technologies at the levels of Substitution and Augmentation, and the stage of innovative use of digital technologies at the levels of Modification and Redefinition. Bloom’s taxonomy is described, which is learning through a set of concepts that begin with lower-order thinking skills and advance to higher-order thinking skills. The relationship between the SAMR model and the development of higher-order cognitive skills in Bloom’s taxonomy was studied. An example of the joint use of the SAMR model and Bloom’s taxonomy in the framework of the formation of digital competencies of future teachers when studying the discipline “Digital education technologies” is considered.
About the Authors
M. Yu. GlotovaRussian Federation
Candidate of Sciences (Physics and Mathematics), Docent, Head of the Department of Information Technologies in Education
E. A. Samokhvalova
Russian Federation
Senior Lecturer at the Department of Information Technologies in Education
References
1. Lubkov A. V., Karakozov S. D. Tsifrovoe obrazovanie dlya tsifrovoj ehkonomiki shkoly [Digital education for the school’s digital economy]. Informatika i obrazovanie — Informatics and Education, 2017, no. 8, p. 3–6. (In Russian.)
2. Uvarov A. Yu. Na puti k tsifrovoj transformatsii shkoly [Towards a digital school transformation]. Moscow, Obrazovanie i Informatika, 2018. 120 p. (In Russian.)
3. Marton F., Dall’Alba G., Beatty E. Conceptions of learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 1993, no. 19, p. 277–300.
4. Glotova M. Yu., Samokhvalova E. A. Formirovanie informatsionno-matematicheskoj kompetentnosti pri realizatsii bazovoj distsipliny osnovnoj obrazovatel’noj programmy s pomoshh’yu lichnostno-orientirovannykh tekhnologij [Formation of informational and mathematical competence in the implementation of the basic discipline of the basic educational program with the help of student-oriented technologies]. Nauka i shkola — Science and School, 2014, no. 1, p. 54–59. (In Russian.)
5. Vodopyan G. M., Uvarov A. Yu. Ot komp’yuternoj gramotnosti i vnedreniya IKT k transformatsii raboty shkoly [From computer literacy and introduction of ICT to transform schools work]. Informatika — Informatics, 2016, no. 5–6, p. 34–43. (In Russian.)
6. Poludnyakova N. A., Viltsina S. A. Obuchayushhie tekhnologii v uchebnom protsesse [Educational technologies in the educational process]. Molodoj uchenyj — Young Scientist, 2014, no. 3, p. 1000–1002. (In Russian.) Available at: https://moluch.ru/archive/62/9339/
7. Uvarov A. Yu. Ob opisanii kompetentsij XXI v. [About the description of competences of the XXI c.] Obrazovatel’naya politika — Educational Policy, 2014, no. 4, p. 13–30. (In Russian.)
8. Puentedura R. R. SAMR: An applied introduction. Available at: http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2014/01/31/SAMRAnAppliedIntroduction.pdf
9. Walsh K. 8 examples of transforming lessons through the SAMR cycle. Available at: https://www.emergingedtech. com/2015/04/examples-of-transforming-lessons-through-samr/
10. Lesson plan SAMR. Available at: https://www. commonsense.org/education/lesson-plans/samr
11. Karakozov S. D., Uvarov A. Yu., Ryzhova N. I. Na puti k modeli tsifrovoj shkoly [Towards a digital school model]. Informatika i obrazovanie — Informatics and Education, 2018, no. 7, p. 4–15. (In Russian.)
12. Baktybayev Zh. Sh. Ispol’zovanie tekhnologii taksonomii Bluma v uchebnom protsesse vuza [Use of Bloom’s taxonomy technology in the university educational process]. Yaroslavskij pedagogicheskij vestnik — Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 2017, no. 1, p. 150–153. (In Russian.) Available at: http://vestnik.yspu.org/releases/2017_1/31.pdf
13. Clark D. R. Bloom’s Taxonomy of learning domains. Available at: http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/bloom.html
14. Anderson L. W., Krathwohl D. R. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, Addison Wesley Longman, 2001.
15. Anderson L. W., Krathwohl D. R., Airasian P. W., Cruikshank K. A., Mayer R. E., Pintrich P. R., Raths J., Wittrock M. C. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives, abdridged edition. New York, Pearson, 2000.
16. Saudabekova E. K., Takizhbaeva N. Z. Professional’naya kompetentnost’ prepodavatelya i taksonomiya Bluma v protsesse vnedreniya innovatsionnykh tekhnologij v sistemu obrazovaniya [The professional competence of the teacher and Bloom’s taxonomy in the process of introducing innovative technologies into the education system]. Vestnik Kazakhskogo natsional’nogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta imeni Аbaya. Seriya: Istoricheskie i sotsial’no-politicheskie nauki — Bulletin of Abay Kazakh National Pedagogical University. Series: Historical, Social and Political Sciences, 2017, no. 1, p. 128–134. (In Russian.) Available at: http://sp.kaznpu.kz/docs/ jurnal_file/file20190506024842.pdf
17. Loginova A. V. Klyuchevye voprosy i problemy integratsii tekhnologij v protsess obucheniya [Key issues and problems of technology integration in the learning process]. Molodoj uchenyj — Young Scientist, 2015, no. 11, p. 1405–1408. (In Russian.) Available at: https://moluch. ru/archive/91/19668/
18. Clark R. C., Chopeta L. Graphics for learning: Proven guidelines for planning, designing, and evaluating visuals in training materials. San Francisco, Pfeiffer, 2004. 544 p. Available at: https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/graphicsfor-learning/9780787969943/
19. Martynetz M. S. Ispol’zovanie taksonomii Bluma dlya opredeleniya maksimal’nogo urovnya obrazovatel’nogo rezul’tata uchashhikhsya s ogranichennymi vozmozhnostyami zdorov’ya i intellektual’nymi narusheniyami [The use of Bloom’s taxonomy to determine the maximum level of educational outcomes of pupils with health disabilities and intellectual disabilities]. Shkol’nye tekhnologii — School Technologies, 2016, no. 4, p. 131–135. (In Russian.) Available at: http://narodnoe.org/journals/shkolnietehnologii/2016-4/ispolzovanie-taksonomii-bluma-dlyaopredeleniya-maksimalnogo-urovnya-obrazovatelnogorezultata-uchashihsya-s-ogranichennimi-vozmojnostyamizdorovya-i-intellektualnimi-narusheniyami
20. Murzagalieva A.E., Utegenova B.M. Sbornik zadanij i uprazhnenij. Uchebnye tseli soglasno taksonomii Bluma [Collection of tasks and exercises. Learning goals according to Bloom’s taxonomy]. Astana, АOO “Nazarbaev Intellektual’nye shkoly” Tsentr pedagogicheskogo masterstva, 2015. 54 p. (In Russian.) Available at: https://kst.nis.edu.kz/wp-content/ uploads/2018/02/Uchebnye-tseli-soglasno-taksonomii-Bluma.-Sbornik-zadanij-i-uprazhnenij.pdf
Review
For citations:
Glotova M.Yu., Samokhvalova E.A. BLOOM'S DIGITAL TAXONOMY AND MODEL OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF EDUCATION IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS OF UNIVERSITY. Informatics and education. 2019;(6):42-48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2019-34-6-42-48