THE DEVELOPMENT OF STUDENTS' METHODOLOGICAL CULTURE WHILE ORGANIZING INFORMATION AND COGNITIVE ACTIVITIES
https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2019-34-6-16-25
Abstract
The article discusses the current research results related to the contents and practice of developing secondary school students’ methodological culture. At present, the Russian pedagogical community is aware that a need to form school students’ methodological culture by developing systemic thinking through the assimilation of subject- and meta-concepts really exists. Moreover, objective conditions have been created to trigger the process. However, the review of scientific and teacher training resources, which are close to the problem under consideration, shows that the strategies for mastering and managing knowledge while performing students’ information and cognitive activity as well as its self-regulation are largely not worked out and are covered in pedagogical literature in a very limited way. The study displayed is the author’s attempt to compensate, at least partially, the existing gap in this sphere. In the context of forming students’ methodological culture, the main role is allocated to assimilating generalized subject- and metaconcepts while performing information and cognitive activity that is necessary for students to systematize knowledge in the subject areas being studied and that is focused on current educational needs and long-term prospects. The most effective ways to master subject- and meta-concepts can be realized while both solving complex cognitive educational tasks and conceptualizing educational situations with the help of cognitive and metacognitive strategies. The info-educational environment the electronic textbook has is taken for an instrumental field to implement the approach described. The author hopes that the research results will interest teaching practitioners, methodologists and other representatives of the Russian pedagogical community who will also be able to share their experience in this sphere.
About the Author
O. M. KorchazhkinaRussian Federation
Candidate of Sciences (Engineering), Senior Research Fellow, Institute for Cybernetics and Informatics in Education
References
1. Belov M. V., Novikov D. A. Metodologiya kompleksnoj deyatel’nosti [Methodology of integrated activities]. Moscow, Lenand, 2018. 320 p. (In Russian.)
2. Yamburg E. A. Chto prinesyot uchitelyu novyj professional’nyj standart pedagoga? [What will the new teacher professional standard bring to the teacher?] Moscow, Prosveshhenie, 2014. 175 p. (In Russian.)
3. Novikov A. M. Metodologiya uchebnoj deyatel’nosti [Methodology of training activities]. Moscow, Ehvges, 2005. 176 p. (In Russian.)
4. Yudin E. G. Metodologiya nauki. Sistemnost’. Deyatel’nost’ [Methodology of science. Consistency. Activity]. Moscow, Ehditorial URSS, 1997. 440 p. (In Russian.)
5. Bahtiyarova E. Z. O sud’bonosnom znachenii NBIKS-tekhnologij v razvitii chelovechestva [On the fateful meaning NBICS technology in the development of humanity]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya — Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 2012, no. 4-1, p. 8–11. (In Russian.) Available at: http://journals.tsu.ru/ philosophy/&journal_page=archive&id=769&article_id=1827
6. Beshenkov S. A., Shutikova M. I., Mindzaeva E. V., Smirnova E. A. Na puti k konvergentsii obshheobrazovatel’nykh kursov informatiki i tekhnologii [Towards comprehensive convergence of courses of informatics and technologies]. Informatika i obrazovanie — Informatics and Education, 2016, no. 6, p. 32–35. (In Russian.)
7. Beshenkov S. A., Shutikova M. I., Mindzaeva E. V. Informatsionno-kognitivnye tekhnologii — sovremennyj obrazovatel’nyj trend [Information cognitive technologies — modern educational trend]. Informatika i obrazovanie — Informatics and Education, 2017, no. 7, p. 26–28. (In Russian.)
8. Beshenkov S. A., Shutikova M. I., Labutin V. B., Filippov V. I., Mindzaeva E. V. Konvergentsiya informatiki i tekhnologii kak platforma sovremennoj intellektual’noj tekhnosfery [Convergence of informatics and technology as the platform of the modern intellectual technosphere]. Informatika i obrazovanie — Informatics and Education, 2018, no. 5, p. 3–6. (In Russian.)
9. Korchazhkina O. M. Sostavlyayushhie inzhenernogo myshleniya i rol’ IKT v ikh formirovanii [Components of engineering thinking and the role of information technologies in their formation]. Informatika i obrazovanie — Informatics and Education, 2018, no. 6, p. 32–38. (In Russian.)
10. Schwab K., Davis N., Nadella S. Shaping the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Geneva, World Economic Forum, 2018. 287 p. Available at: https://www.weforum.org/focus/ shaping-the-fourth-industrial-revolution
11. Korchazhkina O. M. Usvoenie znanievogo komponenta pretsedent kak metapredmetnoj universalii (na primere izucheniya razdelov kursa “Sotsial’naya informatika”) [How to understand a knowledge component precedent as a meta-concept (through the course in social informatics)]. Distantsionnoe i virtual’noe obuchenie — Distance and Virtual Learning, 2017, no, 5, p. 104–118. (In Russian.)
12. Korchazhkina O. M. Metodologicheskaya kontseptsiya integratsii traditsionnykh pedagogicheskikh i novykh informatsionnykh tekhnologij [A methodological conception of how to integrate traditional pedagogical and information technologies]. Informatizatsiya obrazovaniya i nauki — Informatization of Education and Science, 2018, no. 3, p. 3–15. (In Russian.)
13. Oakley B. A. Mind for numbers: How to excel at Math and Science. New York, TarcherPerigee, 2014. 336 p. Available at: https://barbaraoakley.com/books/a-mind-fornumbers/
14. Prikaz Ministerstva obrazovaniya i nauki Rossijskoj Federatsii ot 17 maya 2012 goda № 413 “Ob utverzhdenii federal’nogo gosudarstvennogo obrazovatel’nogo standarta srednego obshhego obrazovaniya” [Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation of May 17, 2012 No. 413 “On approval of the Federal State Educational Standard of Secondary General Education”]. (In Russian.) Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_ LAW_131131/
15. Korchazhkina O. M. Soderzhanie i praktika primeneniya metapredmetnogo podkhoda k smeshannomu obucheniyu [The contents and practice of application of the interdisciplinary approach to blended learning]. Noginsk, Аnalitika Rodis, 2017. 450 p. (In Russian.)
16. Prikaz Ministerstva obrazovaniya i nauki Rossijskoj Federatsii ot 17 dekabrya 2010 goda № 1897 “Ob utverzhdenii federal’nogo gosudarstvennogo obrazovatel’nogo standarta osnovnogo obshhego obrazovaniya” [Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation of December 17, 2010 No. 1897 “On approval of the Federal State Educational Standard of Basic General Education”]. (In Russian.) Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/ cons_doc_LAW_110255/
17. Zorina L. Ya. Didakticheskie osnovy formirovaniya sistemnosti znanij starsheklassnikov [Didactic foundations of formation of high school students’ system knowledge]. Moscow, Pedagogika, 1978. 128 p. (In Russian.)
18. Lerner I. Ya. Didakticheskie osnovy metodov obucheniya [Didactic basics of teaching methods]. Moscow, Pedagogika, 1981. 186 p. (In Russian.)
19. Kudaev M. R., Bogus M. B., Kyatova M. K. Sistema uchebnykh i poznavatel’nykh zadach pri izuchenii gumanitarnogo predmeta [The system of educational and cognitive tasks in the study of humanities]. Vestnik Аdygejskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta — The Bulletin of the Adyghe State University, 2006, no. 1, p. 167–169. (In Russian.) Available at: http://vestnik.adygnet.ru/files/2006.1/76/ kudaev2006_1.pdf
20. Petty G. Teaching today: A practical guide. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2014. 624 p. Available at: https:// global.oup.com/education/product/9781408523148/
21. Mashbits E. I. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie problemy komp’yuterizatsii obucheniya [Psychological and pedagogical problems of computerization of education]. Moscow, Pedagogika, 1988. 193 p. (In Russian.) Available at: https://www. twirpx.com/file/52867/
22. Polya G., Sloan S. Mathematical discovery: On understanding, learning and teaching problem solving. Vol. II. Mountain View, Ishi Press, 2009. 218 p.
23. Korchazhkina O. M. Kontseptualizatsiya uchebnoj situatsii pri metapredmetnom podkhode k obucheniyu [Making the educational situation conceptual in the context of the interdisciplinary approach to education]. Pedagogika — Pedagogy, 2018, no. 10, p. 75–82. (In Russian.)
24. Konopkin O. A. Psikhologicheskie mekhanizmy regulyatsii deyatel’nosti [Psychological mechanisms of activity regulation]. Moscow, Lenand, 2011. 320 p. (In Russian.)
25. Baars B. J., Gage N. M. Cognition, brain and consciousness. Introduction to cognitive neuroscience. New York, Academic Press, 2010. 672 p. Available at: https:// www.elsevier.com/books/cognition-brain-and-consciousness/ baars/978-0-12-375070-9
26. Erdniev P. M., Erdniev B. P. Ukrupnenie didakticheskikh edinits kak tekhnologiya obucheniya. Ch. 1. [Enlargement of didactic units as a learning technology. Vol. 1]. Moscow, Prosveschenie, 1992. 175 p. (In Russian.)
Review
For citations:
Korchazhkina O.M. THE DEVELOPMENT OF STUDENTS' METHODOLOGICAL CULTURE WHILE ORGANIZING INFORMATION AND COGNITIVE ACTIVITIES. Informatics and education. 2019;(6):16-25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2019-34-6-16-25