Prompt engineering in the practice of a higher education teacher: Pedagogical potential and limitations

In the context of the rapid introduction of generative language models into education, prompt engineering is of particular importance as a system of methods for formulating text instructions for AI in order to solve pedagogical problems. The purpose of the study presented in the article is to analyze the pedagogical potential and limitations of prompt engineering in the context of higher education, as well as to determine the directions of its effective use in the professional activity of a teacher.

Key functional areas where prompt engineering can be effectively applied are identified: learning and teaching, methodological, research, project, educational, expert and analytical, communicative. Based on the analysis of theoretical sources and the results of empirical research, a classification of prompts has been developed based on the principles of their construction, with reference to didactic tasks. It is shown that prompts can be used not only to generate educational content, but also to organize reflection, develop critical thinking, and model professional situations. The barriers and risks limiting the implementation of prompt engineering are described: methodological, technological, personnel and organizational. It is noted that the successful integration of technology requires the formation of methodologically sound strategies for teachers, the development of digital competencies and legal regulation of interaction with AI. The presented conclusions were confirmed during the implementation of the program of additional professional education “Artificial intelligence tools and services in the work of a higher education teacher”. The conclusion is made about the high importance of prompt engineering as a component of digital pedagogy and the importance of developing institutional strategies for its implementation.

1. Lee D., Palmer E. Prompt engineering in higher education: A systematic review to help inform curricula. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2025;22(7):1–22. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-025-00503-7.

2. Eager B., Brunton R. Prompting higher education towards AI-augmented teaching and learning practice. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice. 2023;20(5):1-19. DOI: 10.53761/1.20.5.02.

3. Federiakin D., Molerov D., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia O., Maur A. Prompt engineering as a new 21st century skill. Frontiers in Education. 2024;9:1366434. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1366434.

4. Hill P., Narine L., Miller A. Prompt engineering principles for generative AI use in extension. Journal of Extension. 2024;62(3):20. DOI: 10.34068/joe.62.03.20.

5. Park J., Choo S. Generative AI prompt engineering for educators: Practical strategies. Journal of Special Education Technology. 2024;40(3):411–417. DOI: 10.1177/01626434241298954.

6. Mollick E. R., Mollick L. Using AI to implement effective teaching strategies in classrooms: Five strategies, including prompts. The Wharton School Research Paper. 2023. 26 p. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4391243.

7. Lu Y., Yu J., Huang S.-H. S. Illuminating the black box: A psychometric investigation into the multifaceted nature of large language models. ArXiv. 2023. 8 p. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2312.14202.

8. Komarova E. V. Prompt choice for large language models: Business communications. Philology and Culture. 2025;1(79):66–74. (In Russian.) DOI: 10.26907/2782-47562025-79-1-66-74. EDN: VLSMFD.

9. Budaeva D. A., Ziryanova I. N. Pragmalinguistic aspects of the formulation of prompts for ChatGPT in scientific communication. Kazan Science. 2024;7:220–224. (In Russian.) EDN: NAUXGT.

10. Chi Hong Leung. Promoting optimal learning with ChatGPT: A comprehensive exploration of prompt engineering in education. Asian Journal of Contemporary Education. 2024;8(2):104–114. DOI: 10.55493/5052.v8i2.5101.

11. Knoth N., Tolzin A., Janson A., Leimeister J. M. AI literacy and its implications for prompt engineering strategies. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 2024;6:100225. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100225.

12. Walter Y. Embracing the future of Artificial Intelligence in the classroom: The relevance of AI literacy, prompt engineering, and critical thinking in modern education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2024;21(15):1–29. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3.

13. Toktarova V. I., Rebko O. V. Integrating artificial intelligence into the work of an educator: Tools for instructional design and development of educational products. Informatics and Education. 2024;39(1):9–21. (In Russian.) DOI: 10.32517/0234-0453-2024-39-1-9-21. EDN: CPSABT.

14. Eflova M., Shamsutdinova I., Maximova O. Transforming the status and role of the teacher at the institute of higher education in the digital educational environment. Conhecimento & Diversidade. 2023;15(37):162–170. DOI: 10.18316/rcd.v15i37.10944.

15. Mitev A. Z., Tóth R., Vaszkun B. Role transition of higher education teachers due to disruptive technological change: Identity reconstruction for a better teacher-student relationship. The International Journal of Management Education. 2024;22(2):100978. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijme.2024.100978.

16. Zhang Y. Teacher professionalism in higher education: An analysis of multiple identities based on the UK Professional Standards Framework. Frontiers in Educational Research. 2024;7(6):99–104. DOI: 10.25236/fer.2024.070614.

17. Gileva K. The role structure of the professional activity of a higher school teacher in the context of digitalization of the educational environment. Education and Self Development. 2023;19(1):106–120. DOI: 10.26907/esd.18.1.08.

18. Lukinsky I. S., Gorsheneva I. A. Prompt engineering in the educational process and scientific activity or to the question of the necessity of training to work with artificial intelligence. Psychology and Pedagogics in Official Activity. 2024;(4):148–154. (In Russian.) DOI: 10.24412/2658-638X-2024-4-148-154. EDN: HICAWX.

19. Sivarajkumar S., Kelley M., Samolyk-Mazzanti A., Visweswaran S., Wang Y. An empirical evaluation of prompting strategies for large language models in zero-shot clinical natural language processing: Algorithm development and validation study. JMIR Medical Informatics. 2024;12:e55318. DOI: 10.2196/55318.

20. Chen E., Wang D., Xu L., Cao C., Fang X., Lin J. A systematic review on prompt engineering in large language models for K–12 STEM education. ArXiv. 2024. 17 p. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.11123.

21. Woo D. J., Wang D., Yung T., Guo K. Effects of a prompt engineering intervention on undergraduate students’ AI self-efficacy, AI knowledge and prompt engineering ability: A mixed methods study. ArXiv. 2024. 34 p. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2408.07302.

22. Wang M., Wang M., Xu X., Yang L., Cai D., Yin M. Unleashing ChatGPT’s power: A case study on optimizing information retrieval in flipped classrooms via prompt engineering. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. 2024;17:629–641. DOI: 10.1109/TLT.2023.3324714.

23. Emel’yanov A. M. Pedagogical possibilities of industrial engineering application in the development of students’ effective interaction skills wit neural networks. Journal of Pedagogical Studies. 2025;10(1):59–63. (In Russian.) DOI: 10.12737/2500-3305-2025-10-1-59-63. EDN: EMAEBJ.