Using big data and neural network technologies in the creation of adaptive methodological materials for the development of teachers’ research skills
https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2024-39-5-63-77
Abstract
Adaptive learning including adaptive methodological literature plays an important role in improving the effectiveness of teachers’ professional skills development and formation of their research competencies. The article is devoted to the application of big data processing models and neural network technologies in the preparation of adaptive methodological literature for the formation of teachers’ research competencies during the period from 2010 to 2023. Based on the analysis of scientific publications, technical documentation, surveys of teachers and educational analytics, the key principles, methods, and tools of personalization of educational content are identified. Types of data and sources of information for customizing materials to meet the individual needs of research teachers are determined. Criteria and metrics for assessing the effectiveness of adaptive methodological literature are developed, and the prospects of its development on the basis of big data and neural network technologies are substantiated. The problems and limitations of the approaches under consideration are revealed, and recommendations for overcoming them are given. Theoretical significance of the article consists in enhancing scientific concepts of the methodology of adaptive educational content development on the basis of intellectual analysis of big data. The practical value lies in the potential for optimizing the processes of creating personalized methodological resources and developing an adaptive system of pedagogical staff professional development.
Keywords
About the Authors
V. I. AnnushkinRussian Federation
Vladimir I. Annushkin, Doctor of Sciences (Philology), Professor, Professor at the Department of Russian Literature and Intercultural Communication, Faculty of Philology
A. V. Shmeleva
Russian Federation
Anna V. Shmeleva, Candidate of Sciences (Philology), Docent, Head of the Department of Methods of Teaching Russian Language and Literature, Faculty of Russian Philology
References
1. Ganicheva A. N., Ilyina I. V., Kim T. K., Metelkova L. A., Pravdov D. M., Sukhova E. I. Issues of the educational institutions of the secondary vocational education system preparation to various competitions. Education Management Review. 2021;2(42):150–159. (In Russian.) EDN: PYXLPT. DOI: 10.25726/i9251-7537-2765-w.
2. Aleven V., McLaughlin E. A., Glenn R. A., Koedinger K. R. Instruction based on adaptive learning technologies. Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction. New York, Routledge; 2016:522–560.
3. Baker R. S. Stupid tutoring systems, intelligent humans. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 2016;26(2):600–614. DOI: 10.1007/s40593-016-0105-0.
4. Brusilovsky P., Millán E. User models for adaptive hypermedia and adaptive educational systems. The Adaptive Web. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer; 2007;4321:3–53. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-72079-9_1.
5. Chatti M. A., Dyckhoff A. L., Schroeder U., Thüs H. A reference model for learning analytics. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning. 2012;4(5–6):318–331. DOI: 10.1504/IJTEL.2012.05181.
6. Conde M. Á., Hernández-García Á. Learning analy tics for educational decision making. Computers in Human Behavior. 2015;47:1–3. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.034.
7. Drachsler H., Kalz M. The MOOC and learning analytics innovation cycle (MOLAC): A reflective summary of ongoing research and its challenges. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2016;32(3):281–290. DOI: 10.1111/jcal.12135.
8. Fernández-Delgado M., Mucientes M., Vázquez-Barreiros B., Lama M. Learning analytics for the prediction of the educational objectives achievement. Proc. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). Madrid, Spain, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.; 2014:1–4. DOI: 10.1109/FIE.2014.7044402.
9. Hwang G. J., Sung H. Y., Hung C. M., Huang I. A learn ing style perspective to investigate the necessity of develop ing adaptive learning systems. Educational Technology & Society. 2013;16(2):188–197.
10. Khosravi H., Sadiq S., Gasevic D. Development and adoption of an adaptive learning system: Reflections and lessons learned. Proc. 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’20). New York, NY, USA, Association for Computing Machinery; 2020:58–64. DOI: 10.1145/3328778.3366900.
11. Kulik J. A., Fletcher J. D. Effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems: A meta-analytic review. Re view of Educational Research. 2016;86(1):42–78. DOI: 10.3102/0034654315581420.
12. Lynch C. F. Who prophets from big data in education? New insights and new challenges. Theory and Research in Education. 2017;15(3):249–271. DOI: 10.1177/1477878517738448.
13. Paquette L., De Carvalho A. M. J. A., Baker R. S. To wards understanding expert coding of student disengagement in online learning. Proc. 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2014). Quebec City, Canada, The Cognitive Science Society; 2014:1126–1131.
14. Romero C., Ventura S. Educational data science in massive open online courses. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. 2017;7(1):e1187. DOI: 10.1002/widm.1187.
15. Schraw G., Dennison R. S. Assessing metacogni tive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 1994;19(4):460–475. DOI:10.1006/ceps.1994.1033.
16. Vallejo M., Bernárdez Gómez A., Torres-Soto A., Nieto-Cano J. M. Professional relationships and professional learning from a generational perspective. Professional Development in Education. 2024:1–16. DOI: 10.1080/19415257.2024.2335962.
17. Rosé C. P., McLaughlin E. A., Liu R., Koedinger K. R. Explanatory learner models: Why machine learning (alone) is not the answer. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2019;50(6):2943–2958. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12858.
18. Sergis S., Sampson D. G. Teaching and learning analytics to support teacher inquiry: A systematic literature review. Learning analytics: Fundaments, applications, and trends. Berlin, Springer; 2017;94:25–63. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-52977-6_2.
19. Siemens G., Long P. Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE review. 2011;46(5): 30–40.
20. Tsai Y.-S., Gasevic D. Learning analytics in higher education — challenges and policies: A review of eight learning analytics policies. Proc. 7th Int. Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conf. (LAK’17). 2017:233–242. DOI: 10.1145/3027385.30274.
21. Pardo A., Jovanovic J., Dawson S., Gašević D., Mirriahi N. Using learning analytics to scale the provision of personalised feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2019;50(1):128–138. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12592.
Review
For citations:
Annushkin V.I., Shmeleva A.V. Using big data and neural network technologies in the creation of adaptive methodological materials for the development of teachers’ research skills. Informatics and education. 2024;39(5):63-77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2024-39-5-63-77