Preview

Informatics and education

Advanced search

Digital educational environment: the methodological aspect of launching innovations

https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2023-38-6-45-51

Abstract

The postnonclassical methodology of environment-oriented learning is based on the synthesis of informatics, psychology and pedagogy. The pedagogical constructs of the digital learning environment are three types of digital pedagogical resources: information, communication, and management of learning and cognitive activities.

The interdisciplinary approach allowed us to define a digital learning system functioning in an educational environment enriched with a digital part. The digital learning system includes the subjects of the educational process (teachers and learners) as well as new objects functioning on a digital platform: three types of interrelated pedagogical resources. Under certain conditions, the system acts as an integrity and fulfills the educational function.

The value of the article lies in the substantiation of the necessity to change connections in the digital learning system in order to achieve innovative effects. It is substantiated that the necessary condition for the manifestation of innovative effects is the actualization of new connections and relations between the elements of the highlighted system. The profound changes in the digital learning system require a radical restructuring of the links and relations in accordance with the post-non-classical pedagogical methodology. For this purpose, in accordance with the first fundamental law of cybernetics, it is necessary to increase the diversity of the process control system. Such diversity can be achieved by increasing the freedom of educational actions of students not only by expanding the spatial and temporal framework of activity but also by the ability to choose the depth, the functionality of problem solving, the situation of its solution through a variety of information and communication actions in the digital environment. The expansion of the space of educational choice and the responsibility associated with it contributes to a conscious independence in learning, student’s transition from the position of the object of control by the teacher to the subject of co-management, self-management of learning activities.

The system-forming factor of digital transformation of activity is defined as setting the goals of educational activity associated with the adoption of new values, both terminal and instrumental. The emergence of the third digital divide, preventing the achievement of innovative effects in the developing educational environment, is substantiated.

The article is addressed to university teachers oriented to achieve new results of professional training in the use of digital environment. The presented scientific approaches are new for domestic and foreign practice.

About the Author

T. N. Noskova
The Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
Russian Federation

Tatiana N. Noskova, Doctor of Sciences (Education), Professor, Head of the Department of Digital Education, Institute of Information Technology and Technology Education

Saint-Petersburg



References

1. Efimov V. S., Lapteva A. V. University 4.0: Philosophical and methodological analysis. Journal University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2017;21(1):16–29. (In Russian.) EDN: YGTEPL.

2. Robert I. V. Methodology of informatization of education. Problems of Modern Education. 2011;(2):28–60. (In Russian.) EDN: NTPKKH.

3. Korotenkov Yu. G. The concept and the problems of educational mediainformatization. Informatics and Education. 2012;(4(233)):104–107. (In Russian.) EDN: OYRAZT.

4. Krechetnikov K. G. et al. Methodological foundations for the formation of a modern digital educational environment. Nizhny Novgorod, SPO “Professionalnaya nauka”; 2018. 174 p. (In Russian.) EDN: XUCTWP.

5. Shilova O. N. Digital learning environment: Pedagogical comprehension. Man and Education. 2020;(2(63)):36–41. (In Russian.) EDN: PMMJVN. DOI: 10.54884/S181570410020772-4.

6. Kondakov A. M., Sergeev I.S. Education in a convergent environment: Problem statement. Pedagogika. 2020;84(12):5–21. (In Russian.) EDN: PBHDZH.

7. Yasvin V. A. Educational environment: From modeling to design. Moscow, Smysl; 2001. 365 p. (In Russian.) EDN: OFJKFI.

8. Panov V. I. Psychodidactics of educational systems: Theory and practice. Saint Petersburg, Piter; 2007. 352 p. (In Russian.) Available at: http://www.vgpgk.vrn.ru/files/2017_05_03/Панов%20В.И.%20Психодидактика%20образовательных%20систем.pdf

9. Baeva I. A., Laktionova E. B. Expert assessment of the educational environment for comfort and safety. Psychological Science and Education. 2013;18(6):5–12. (In Russian.) EDN: SENSPL.

10. Kats Y. Learning management system technologies and software solutions for online teaching: Tools and applications. Hershey PA, USA, IGI Global, Information Science Reference; 2010. 486 p. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61520-853-1.

11. Gruzdeva M. L., Feofanova T. D. Possibilities of use of digital platforms in education. Modern High Technologies. 2022;(6):104–108. (In Russian.) EDN: HYNCYR. DOI: 10.17513/snt.39208.

12. Dias S. B., Diniz J. A., Hadjileontiadis L. J. Towards an intelligent learning management system under blended learning. Trends, profiles and modeling perspectives. Springer Cham, Switzerland; 2013. 235 p. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-02078-5.

13. Noskova T. N. Didactics of digital environment. Monograph. Saint Petersburg, Publishing House of Herzen University; 2020. 383 p. (In Russian.) EDN: UEWGKC.

14. Bertalanffy L. General systems theory — a survey of problems and results. System Research. Yearbook. Moscow, Nauka; 1969. 203 p. (In Russian.). Available at: http://systems-analysis.ru/assets/systems_research_1969.pdf

15. Ashby W. R. Introduction to cybernetics. Moscow, Inostrannaya literatura; 1959. 432 p. (In Russian.)

16. Rokeach M. A theory of organization and change within value-attitude systems. Journal of Social Issues. 1968;24(1):13–33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1968.tb01466.x.

17. Fedosova O. A., Sokolina E. N. About digital culture as an integral part of the general human culture in modern realities. Symbol of Science: International Scientific Journal. 2022;(2–1):95–96. (In Russian.). EDN: HYQQMC.

18. Yakovleva O. V. Value component of the digital educational environment in the context of professional education for future teachers. Pushkin Leningrad State University Journal. 2020;(2):257–274. (In Russian.) EDN: JWMKTL.

19. Martsinkovskaya T. D. Informational socialization in changing information space. Psychological Studies. 2012;5(26):7. (In Russian.) EDN: QBGZKL. DOI: 10.54359/ps.v5i26.738.

20. Scheerder A., Deursen A., Van Dijk J. Determinants of Internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide. Telematics and Informatics. 2017;34(8):1607–1624. DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007.

21. Noskova T. N., Pavlova T. B. Pedagogical goal-setting in a digital environment: Problem actualization. E-learning in the Time of COVID-19. Proc. of the 13th Annual Int. Sci. Conf. “Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Distance Learning”. Katowice-Cieszyn, TUDIO NOA for University of Silesia in Katowice; 2021;13:125–136. EDN: RWFYOC. DOI: 10.34916/el.2021.13.11.

22. Puentedura R. R. SAMR: Moving from enhancement to transformation. 2013. Available at: http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2013/05/29/SAMREnhancement-ToTransformation.pdf


Review

For citations:


Noskova T.N. Digital educational environment: the methodological aspect of launching innovations. Informatics and education. 2023;38(6):45-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2023-38-6-45-51

Views: 459


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0234-0453 (Print)
ISSN 2658-7769 (Online)